Quote:
Originally Posted by yakfish
I guess the title pretty much explains itself. I though if would be interesting to see why people decide to become Christians? Why you believe in God? Why do you believe the Bible? How do you know God exists? How can you trust the Bible we have today is the one God intended for us to have?
|
From the multiple perspectives.
The question boils down to how will you be able to reach the truth of an after life.
Human intelligence, human knowledge and even science are not the reliable mean to reach such a truth (i.e., even when it is a truth).
The Bible is right about this, it is said that the Tree of Life is guarded from humans. Humans have no way to see through life beyond the physical death.
It an after life is a truth, it can thus be categorized as the kind of truth which is not reachable to humans in our time frame. Just like that there's no way for the truth of the existence of black holes can reach humans in stone age. The truth of black holes can't reach humans in stone age, just like the truth (if any) of an after life can't reach humans in our era.
The question left is, if so how can humans reach such a truth. If you are sent back to stone age by a time machine but without giving any modern resources, how will you be able to let them know that black holes do exist? The answer is, such a truth can reach humans in stone age by the one and only way called human witnessing. You are a witness in this case, humans in stone age will have to rely on you to reach such a truth. They have to choose to believe you or not. Those who believe in you will be able to reach such a truth, there's no other way round.
Human witnessing is a profound way for humans to reach a truth, without being realized by humans themselves though. Witnessing basically means you put faith on what have been said and written down by a small group of human individuals, who are believed to have a direct contact with a truth, to reach such a truth. The following are the examples,
1) history (i.e., his story)
You rely on putting faith on what have been written down by a small group of humans (called historians) to reach a historical truth. Under most circumstance, there's no other way round. By very nature of history that it is a result of witnessing. History is not evidence-based and thus can hardly be verified precisely. The more distant history is, the more impossible for its evidence to be collectable.
2) science
Science is verified with its predictability. However, science is commonly conveyed through human witnessing. You put faith on what have been written down by a small group of humans (called scientists) to reach a truth. 99% humans don't bother doing labs all the times to verify any scientific truth. They simply choose to believe what have been said and done by the scientists.
3) daily news about the truths occurred in this world
You have to rely on the media which is composed of a small group of humans (called reporters/writers) to reach such a kind of truth. You don't go out to the scenes to examine any truth by yourself.
Because humans rely mainly on witnessing to reach a truth (of any kind), it thus boils down to how a witnessing is validated. In today's world, you trust the media because of several things. It is a multiple account witnessing backed with technology such as videos and photos and voice records and so forth.
In terms of history, then all you can have at best is a multiple account witnessing where historians from various sources mentioned about the same event or same figure. Even though science is repeatedly verifiable, no one bothers to do the verification through a lab setup. Multiple accounts/sources of the same kind of experiment results, peer reports and etc. act as a valid witnessing for you to believe that what is said is a truth.
Now, which religion employs the same profound way, that is human witnessing, to convey a claimed truth? Only the Bible (OT and NT) are able to explicitly employ such a way to convey the said truth. Prophets are explicitly regarded as God's witnesses. Not only that the Bible employs a multiple account of witnessing which other religions are missing, martyrdom is employed to further validate the witnessing.
Basically, no witnessing is more valid than that the witnesses martyred themselves for what have been witnessed. The analogy is that it is claimed that there's a bomb near your house, people died to get the message out. There's no point there to choose to stay, yet this seems to be the choice of today's humans.