Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-14-2015, 02:51 PM
 
65 posts, read 121,403 times
Reputation: 59

Advertisements

Who started transubstantiation? I think it was Simon the Magician, of Acts 8. He was a sorcerer, just the type of person to perform a magic trick. First-century documents put him in Rome, in front of Nero, performing magic tricks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-14-2015, 03:05 PM
 
1,569 posts, read 1,331,273 times
Reputation: 661
don't think anybody "invented" it. the word is a term describing (not explaining) the Catholic (also Eastern Orthodox and some Anglicans) belief that the bread and wine in the communion service are changed (transformed from one substance to another--hence "transubstantiation") by the power of God in to the real body and blood of Jesus (AKA the "real/objective presence"). this follows on the literal interpretation of John 6: 53-56:

"Let me solemnly assure you if you do not eat the body of the Son of Man and drink His blood you have no life in you.

"he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life and I will raise him up on the last day. for my flesh is true food and blood is true drink. he eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in Me and I abide in him." (FWIW, the "eat" is apparently rendered in the original texts as literally "chew").

Catholics (and Eastern Orthodox though they do not use the term) believe that Jesus meant this very literally and apparently his listeners also took him literally because they regarded it as a "hard saying" and many left him because they couldn't believe it---and he didn't try to bring them back
by saying that he meant something more subtle.

if Christians can believe in the virgin birth, or water changed into wine, Jesus walking on the water, the dead being raised, and a crucified man coming back to life---one more miracle should not be that much more to swallow.

Last edited by georgeinbandonoregon; 03-14-2015 at 04:24 PM.. Reason: more info.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top