Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Toronto isn't centrally located in porportion to the rest of North America. Even Chicago is located a bit too north. Think about it like this, which city would it be about roughly the same distance, give or take a couple 100 miles) to travel to from all the major population centers across North America?
Certainly not Toronto.
Anyways, taking in all the criteria, I think Los Angeles is the best choice, despite its west coast location, it is the best representative of ALL of North America, not just the english speaking nations.
Toronto isn't centrally located in porportion to the rest of North America. Even Chicago is located a bit too north. Think about it like this, which city would it be about roughly the same distance, give or take a couple 100 miles) to travel to from all the major population centers across North America?
Certainly not Toronto.
Anyways, taking in all the criteria, I think Los Angeles is the best choice, despite its west coast location, it is the best representative of ALL of North America, not just the english speaking nations.
That's about the sane line of thinking I had. That leaves Atlanta or a city in Texas. Probably Dallas, which is not on the list for reasons specified by the OP.
I guess I was one of only two to vote for Toronto.
Despite its far Northern location, it truly is "the world in a city" to me. I have never seen such diversity outside of NY & London. That came to mind before anything, really.
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,043,145 times
Reputation: 4047
Lol does anyone even attempt at the criteria anymore?
And about Chicago & Toronto for centralization, I found them to be as central to North America's total land mass as any major city (cities) can possibly ever get, leaning a bit East though:
Lol does anyone even attempt at the criteria anymore?
And about Chicago & Toronto for centralization, I found them to be as central to North America's total land mass as any major city (cities) can possibly ever get, leaning a bit East though:
There's about 50k people living above the red line.
Mexico City, the largest city in the Americas. It's also coming up on its 700 years.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.