Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Isn't the reality that in most metro areas there is more than one entity that is not a suburb? This is especially becoming more apparent as there is more than one core employment area but multiple hubs where people commute to and have cores of their own.
In Chicagoland, Joliet, IL sort of acts as a city/suburb with other municipalities such as Plainfield, Shorewood, Bolingbrook, Romeoville acting as "Quasi-Suburbs" of Joliet.
Once again: IT IS CALLED THE "SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA" BECAUSE IT IS THE AREA AROUND SAN FRANCISCO BAY. IF IT WERE THE AREA AROUND SAN FRANCISCO, THEY'D CALL IT THE "SAN FRANCISCO AREA."
Does your metro have suburbs that are more related to another suburb than they are to a central city? I suspect that many metros do.
I'll start. Raleigh's major suburb is Cary. At 140,000 people, Cary has Morrisville immediately adjacent and related to Cary more than it is to either Raleigh or Durham. Some might say that the same is true for Apex. But, at 35,000 people, Apex simply seems too large to me to be considered a suburb of a suburb.
Another suburb of Raleigh is Wake Forest. Wake Forest has Rolesville related to it as its "suburb".
I dunno if I'd say Rollesville is a suburb of Wake forest since wake forest is too small. Morrisville is definitely like a suburb to Cary and Durham tho.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.