Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-03-2012, 11:56 AM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,515,379 times
Reputation: 9193

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LakeShoreSoxGo View Post
LA is still recovering financially from the last olympics.
No, actually the 1984 Olympics at the time was the second Olympics in history to turn a profit--and the first one was the Summer Games in 1932 also held in Los Angeles. The 1984 games made a profit of over $250 million and did it without taking any government funding.

Last edited by Deezus; 08-03-2012 at 12:07 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-03-2012, 12:02 PM
 
Location: So California
8,704 posts, read 11,112,206 times
Reputation: 4794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deezus View Post
No, actually the 1984 Olympics at the time was the second Olympics in history to turn a profit--and the first one was the Summer Games in 1932 also held in Los Angeles. The 1984 games made a profit of over $250 million.

He has no clue what comes out of his head......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2012, 12:14 PM
 
Location: LBC
4,156 posts, read 5,559,233 times
Reputation: 3594
Quote:
Originally Posted by slo1318 View Post
He has no clue what comes out of his head......
I guess not. That was an Olympian fail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2012, 12:18 PM
 
Location: LBC
4,156 posts, read 5,559,233 times
Reputation: 3594
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deezus View Post
No, actually the 1984 Olympics at the time was the second Olympics in history to turn a profit--and the first one was the Summer Games in 1932 also held in Los Angeles. The 1984 games made a profit of over $250 million and did it without taking any government funding.
And a lot of that profit was plowed back into local youth sports programs, which helps explain some the athletic success reflected by that graph.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2012, 12:22 PM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,515,379 times
Reputation: 9193
Quote:
Originally Posted by nslander View Post
And a lot of that profit was plowed back into local youth sports programs, which helps explain some the athletic success reflected by that graph.
Yes, that's an intersting fact.

And the LA Olympics became the model for successful Olympics in the last 25 years. Prior to that most Olympics were a financial mess--Montreal was in debt for over $1 Billion after 1976 and hardly anyone even wanted to bid for the Olympics after that. Peter Ueberroth used a combination of existing facilities and corporate sponsorship to make the 1984 games financially viable--and since then you've had other Summer Olympics that actually profited as well as in Seoul and Sydney.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2012, 03:00 PM
 
93 posts, read 158,181 times
Reputation: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by LakeShoreSoxGo View Post
LA is still recovering financially from the last olympics.
Sometimes I wonder what flights of fancy makes people utter the most unreal statements such as the one above,

it was a well documented fact that the Olympics were almost dead in the water
after the terrible economic ordeal of the Montreal Olympiads most cities were afraid to step up to the chellange.
LA was the first city to ever host an Olympic game that turn a profit of 225 million since 1932


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2012, 05:26 PM
 
14,019 posts, read 14,998,668 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeridianX View Post
Sometimes I wonder what flights of fancy makes people utter the most unreal statements such as the one above,

it was a well documented fact that the Olympics were almost dead in the water
after the terrible economic ordeal of the Montreal Olympiads most cities were afraid to step up to the chellange.
LA was the first city to ever host an Olympic game that turn a profit of 225 million since 1932

Thats because they had most of the infustructure already in place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2012, 05:32 PM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,515,379 times
Reputation: 9193
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
Thats because they had most of the infustructure already in place.
Which should be probably be the key criterea for selecting a viable Olympic site. But on the other hand, the Olympic officials don't care if the host city/country goes bankrupt(Sorry Athens!) as long as they pay off the right people in the bidding process. But most cities that construct a bunch of facilities for the Olympics end up with a bunch of empty facilties to pay off for years later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2012, 05:40 PM
 
14,019 posts, read 14,998,668 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deezus View Post
Which should be probably be the key criterea for selecting a viable Olympic site. But on the other hand, the Olympic officials don't care if the host city/country goes bankrupt(Sorry Athens!) as long as they pay off the right people in the bidding process. But most cities that construct a bunch of facilities for the Olympics end up with a bunch of empty facilties to pay off for years later.
Cities like LA, Boston, The Bay Area, and DFW really don't have to build much because of the already massive amounts of arenas already existing in the cities immediate area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2012, 10:41 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis (St. Louis Park)
5,993 posts, read 10,183,714 times
Reputation: 4407
I'd want to see the Winter Olympics as well, in addition to "Total Olympics" -- both fields!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top