Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-22-2012, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Austin
1,795 posts, read 3,167,649 times
Reputation: 1255

Advertisements

Austin. It's growth has been phenomenal and there is no slowing down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-22-2012, 05:47 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,953,051 times
Reputation: 7752
Fort Worth
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 06:08 PM
 
1,016 posts, read 2,979,340 times
Reputation: 1668
I have to say Columbus, OH. As ignored as it is, it's actually a very progressive city that has a lot of jobs and is moving in the right direction. I see a lot of future potential in Columbus. It has roughly a little over 700,000 but I definitely see it reaching that 1,000,000 mark(just the city not including the suburbs).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 07:23 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
1,355 posts, read 2,680,405 times
Reputation: 639
Charlotte and Austin will probably reach 1M around the same time. Those two are the fastest growing in the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 08:07 PM
 
Location: Indianapolis
3,892 posts, read 5,513,903 times
Reputation: 957
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoninATX View Post
Austin. It's growth has been phenomenal and there is no slowing down.
Im not denying Austin is growing fast.
Just i think the Census is overestimating Austin's population for 2011.
The Census did this for Atlanta for the past 10 years.
2009 estimate Atlanta's Fulton County had 1M people.
2010 census=900k which is a 10% over estimation.
So i take the Census Estimates with a small grain of salt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 11:01 PM
 
16,345 posts, read 18,063,833 times
Reputation: 7879
First to last, assuming growth trends from the last 20 years or so stay the same, which they won't.

Fort Worth
Austin
Charlotte
Columbus
Indianapolis
Jacksonville
SF
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 11:15 PM
 
11,289 posts, read 26,199,461 times
Reputation: 11355
Whichever one has the most open land within their borders and is growing fast. Indy is up there, but it's slow and steady from 700K to 820K over 30 years. It needs a pop if it's going to get up over a million in the next 30 years. Also needs open land to build.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 11:48 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,165,301 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago60614 View Post
Whichever one has the most open land within their borders and is growing fast. Indy is up there, but it's slow and steady from 700K to 820K over 30 years. It needs a pop if it's going to get up over a million in the next 30 years. Also needs open land to build.
Jacksonville, while not the fastest growing of the list, has by far the most available land on which to grow. If some of the other cities can annex land adjacent that is already developed and populated, that could be the wild card.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2012, 11:56 PM
 
Location: Austin, Texas
1,985 posts, read 3,318,930 times
Reputation: 1705
I don't care who reaches the 1,000,000 mark first. As long as Austin keeps its hault on annexation steady, I'm happy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2012, 07:40 PM
 
Location: Indianapolis
3,892 posts, read 5,513,903 times
Reputation: 957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austinite101 View Post
I don't care who reaches the 1,000,000 mark first. As long as Austin keeps its hault on annexation steady, I'm happy.
I think Austin needs to slow down its growth rate by 25%.
If you grow to fast as a city/metro then you start running into problems such as crowded Freeways/High taxes/high cost of real estate etc.
Indianapolis grew 15% in the past 10 years and 40% in the past 20 years. That is a better growth rate. Than doubling your population in 10 years and having clogged freeways/smog etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top