Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-17-2013, 01:56 AM
 
Location: Near Boulder, CO
19 posts, read 35,476 times
Reputation: 30

Advertisements

Hello everyone! My situation is that I'm trying to prioritize between two police department jobs in Seattle and Denver. First off, let me clarify that I'm looking at the area as a whole around the cities, not necessarily to be right smack dab in the middle of the city. So places like Aurora and Renton are definitely on the table and even further out(Everett maybe?) depending on circumstances.

Anyway, in Seattle I'd start out at 67.7k a year(88.9k at 5 years in) while in Denver I'd be starting out at 52.1k a year(77.7k at 3 years in). Taking into account cost of living, I estimate that I'm out ahead in the beginning in Seattle, but the Seattle 5 year and Denver 3 year are basically at the same level of comfort when taking cost of living into consideration, I think. Correct me if I'm wrong. Anyway, so about how far will those four different salaries get me in those two areas?

And I don't know if this throws a wrinkle in it or not, but I think my healthcare premiums and my wife's and future children's healthcare premiums would be completely paid for in Seattle while I would have to pay some of the premium a month in Denver, though I can only guess how much. This is shaky information as I'm inferring it from some of the information I do know.

Now, one big thing: I'm willing to sacrifice commute time if it means I can live in a house. I'll give Seattle credit, their apartments are really swanky. But I just really want a house instead. I currently live in a suburb of Salt Lake City, Utah and I think we're actually rated as having much worse commutes than either Seattle or Denver, so either one would probably be an improvement for me. However, I would ideally like to keep my commute under 30 minutes, which may be a problem for Seattle and owning a house.

To give it a little perspective, I've done the calculations and I could live comfortably, for me, for about 40k a year here in the outskirts of SLC(and I think that says more about me than it does SLC, to be honest). This isn't counting whatever expenses and income my wife has. She'll be working too, but I want to get a good idea of how much I will personally be able to contribute.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-18-2013, 02:36 PM
 
Location: Finger Lakes Region, New York
132 posts, read 546,118 times
Reputation: 148
I'm gonna say Seattle.

Boulder is more expensive than Seattle proper, while Everett and Tacoma are cheaper than Denver proper. So you could find expensive and cheap places to live in both areas. Since you don't seem like a high maintenance family, I'd say get a cheaper place in Washington, take the bigger paycheck, and save.

Though, you may also want to consider the future of housing markets. I can't imagine anyone making money on houses in Las Vegas or Phoenix for years to come. I'm not sure if Denver or Seattle are in the boat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2013, 10:14 PM
 
Location: C-U metro
1,368 posts, read 3,220,049 times
Reputation: 1192
Considering your age, I would recommend Denver. You'll need to the get your income up for both places but median age for Seattle Metro is 45, Denver is 37 according to Forbes. You'll be more likely to be around people your own age rather than Baby Boomer socialists and union workers who are mad at Ma Boeing for taking away the 777 plane. The younger folks moving to Seattle tend to work for Microsoft or Amazon but unless you are in tech circles, they are tough to find.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2013, 12:14 AM
 
1,108 posts, read 2,289,117 times
Reputation: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyingcat2k View Post
Considering your age, I would recommend Denver. You'll need to the get your income up for both places but median age for Seattle Metro is 45, Denver is 37 according to Forbes. You'll be more likely to be around people your own age rather than Baby Boomer socialists and union workers who are mad at Ma Boeing for taking away the 777 plane. The younger folks moving to Seattle tend to work for Microsoft or Amazon but unless you are in tech circles, they are tough to find.
Seattle proper - especially the urban parts - is actually a very young City.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top