Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: northern Vermont - previously NM, WA, & MA
10,745 posts, read 23,804,636 times
Reputation: 14660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawaii4evr
I suppose...but Boston's skyline is very disappointing. Maybe that had something to do with it.
Yeah I like how Philadelphia blends old school historic with a modern and contemporary skyline with nice standout buildings (Liberty Place is stunning). Boston's skyline seems so...well..uniform. It has distinctive looking towers, but they're not very pretty. I think its the International Place buildings in the forefront when viewed from the harbor, I never liked those buildings. I do love the John Hancock tower though (wide and skinny blue glass one in the Back Bay). The Pru is hideous (except at night).
So you are presenting opinion as being factual? Sorry but I'm quite sure of myself when I say that I think Chicago is more visually attractive.
Are you sure you are sure of yourself?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
