Better foodie city LA vs San Francisco? (quality, size, airport)

[yby1]

I like both. SF for higher end dining and LA for lower end dining. Both are good at the mid range.

[2Easy]

For my personal tastes it's LA by far because of the variety at the mid and low range. But I'm not a foodie, so that's probably the wrong answer.

[grapico]

I think foodies typically eat more variety and mid/low range... high range stuff are gourmands.

[dalparadise]

Originally Posted by dispo4

Please explain. Do you disagree?

I have found a great number of excellent food trucks in SF, but none to match the ones that service commercial shoots in LA.

[18Montclair]

Originally Posted by Lets Eat Candy

I've also noticed just on this forum that LA and SF posters rarely bicker

I've noticed that too and I like it.



#golden

[jamills21]

Originally Posted by 18Montclair

I've noticed that too and I like it.



#golden

Both cities are jealous of each others qualities

[dalparadise]

Originally Posted by jamills21

Both cities are jealous of each others qualities

Ha! That's probably true.

[Nafster]

Both cities don't have Dunkin' Donuts = they both suck

[RaymondChandlerLives]

Originally Posted by Nafster

Both cities don't have Dunkin' Donuts = they both suck

Ha! LA closes down shops that spank Dunkin Donuts for quality.

Best Donuts in LA - Thrillist Los Angeles

[dispo4]

Originally Posted by dalparadise

Please explain. Do you disagree?

I have found a great number of excellent food trucks in SF, but none to match the ones that service commercial shoots in LA.

Unless you work in media how would you even know these trucks are good? Food trucks have been an LA staple for decades, everyone else just hopped on the "trend" when kogi made headlines.