Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-08-2015, 05:20 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
2,653 posts, read 3,044,875 times
Reputation: 2870

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyMIA View Post
Miami matero is very compact compared to places like LA, Atlanta, Dallas. Houston etc..
Could be because they're hemmed in by swamp on the east and the Ocean on the west.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-08-2015, 05:52 PM
 
Location: Seattle aka tier 3 city :)
1,259 posts, read 1,404,906 times
Reputation: 993
Quote:
Originally Posted by DougStark View Post
Could be because they're hemmed in by swamp on the east and the Ocean on the west.
LA metro wallops Miami metro in density, so an erroneous post on his/her behalf.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 06:55 PM
 
14,019 posts, read 15,001,786 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calisonn View Post
LA metro wallops Miami metro in density, so an erroneous post on his/her behalf.
That's because marsh/swamp counts a land. so pop/land area for Miami is lower than actual land/population
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 07:13 PM
 
Location: Seattle aka tier 3 city :)
1,259 posts, read 1,404,906 times
Reputation: 993
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
That's because marsh/swamp counts a land. so pop/land area for Miami is lower than actual land/population
I am not disagreeing that Miami metro is dense for the south, but to say it's denser than LA is another thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 07:36 PM
 
Location: Louisville
5,293 posts, read 6,056,775 times
Reputation: 9623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calisonn View Post
I am not disagreeing that Miami metro is dense for the south, but to say it's denser than LA is another thing.
I'm not really sure it's a fair comparison, since metro areas are based on counties there's a whole bunch of uninhabitable swamp that's tacked onto Miami metros land size. I think a more fair comparison is urban area, in which LA is still way more dense, it might be the most dense urban area in the country. Miami's UA is still impressively dense though, not just by southern standards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 07:46 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
5,287 posts, read 5,784,865 times
Reputation: 4474
The Texas urban areas are just about half way in between Miami and Atlanta in density, and as Houston fills in it will be more like the former. New Orleans has just 900 fewer ppsm.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 08:11 PM
 
Location: Katy,Texas
6,470 posts, read 4,068,399 times
Reputation: 4517
Quote:
Originally Posted by fieldm View Post

North/South


LA: Santa Clarita to Laguna Niguel is 87 miles

Atlanta: Cumming to Newnan is 78 miles

Houston: The Woodlands to League City is 57 miles





East/ West

LA: Thousands Oaks to Redlands is 105 miles

Atlanta: Villa Rica to Covington is 67 miles

Houston: Katy, TN to Baytown is 54 miles
Good list but H-town sprawls all the way to Galveston almost non-stop. Also It would more like Conroe to Galveston 90 miles. Also if you want to stretch it The southern part of Galveston Island to Panorama Village, Texas 115 miles. Also if you truly want to go as far east to as far west, it is Rosenberg to Galveston roughly 75 miles. or Maybe Mont Belvieu to Katy/Rosenberg/
Also NYC East to West at the least is 100 miles. (Shirley, NY to Mount Olive Township, NJ)
Branford, Conneticut to Tom's River, New Jersey is 150 miles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 08:57 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
5,287 posts, read 5,784,865 times
Reputation: 4474
Quote:
Originally Posted by NigerianNightmare View Post
Good list but H-town sprawls all the way to Galveston almost non-stop. Also It would more like Conroe to Galveston 90 miles. Also if you want to stretch it The southern part of Galveston Island to Panorama Village, Texas 115 miles. Also if you truly want to go as far east to as far west, it is Rosenberg to Galveston roughly 75 miles. or Maybe Mont Belvieu to Katy/Rosenberg/
Also NYC East to West at the least is 100 miles. (Shirley, NY to Mount Olive Township, NJ)
Branford, Conneticut to Tom's River, New Jersey is 150 miles.
Conroe and Galveston are only part of the metro area, though; not the urban area, so they don't qualify as "the city".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 09:29 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,150,335 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by polo89 View Post
Greater Miami has plenty of sprawl, but Miamis' city limits might be the least sprawling large city in the South. The city is only 35sq. miles, and most neighborhoods in the city are dense.
I think that people get confused by how sprawl is measured. Certainly greater Miami is developed well beyond its tiny city limits but it eats less land per person than many other metros. This is why it's considered less sprawled. The reality is that greater Miami is bound on its east by the ocean and on its west by the Everglades and other protected wetlands. This keeps the metro area population growing more within its current footprint than the typical metro pattern that just keeps spreading out in all directions.

Most cities that have "grown up" post WWII have typically sprawled the most because they were built almost exclusively on the automobile development model. Where water is plentiful and the land generally flat or manageable, the development model was typically even more sprawled because there are usually larger single family lots, more tree buffers, etc. It's only after the resulting traffic chokes the quality of life in these metros do they start to look inward to more density and less sprawl. Today, this aligns perfectly with the increased desire by many for walkable neighborhoods, urban renewal and shorter commutes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2015, 10:44 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,695,817 times
Reputation: 5872
This seems like a list of least and most sprawling cities rather than metros
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top