Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which city has a bigger proliferation of palm trees?
Los Angeles 24 24.24%
Miami 75 75.76%
Voters: 99. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-29-2014, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Milwaukee
3,453 posts, read 4,527,042 times
Reputation: 2987

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by L.A.-Mex View Post
It would be a shame if they stopped planting palms.
Why exactly?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-29-2014, 03:48 PM
 
Location: Who Cares, USA
2,341 posts, read 3,594,946 times
Reputation: 2258
Quote:
Originally Posted by OptimusPrime69 View Post
I can never tell the difference between a california fan and the mexican fan?? How can one tell which one is which?
California fans are more short and stubby. Thicker, shorter trunks. Mexican fans are taller and have more slender trunks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2014, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
2,412 posts, read 2,472,472 times
Reputation: 531
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheese plate View Post
Why exactly?
they are an LA icon and form part of LA's unique identity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2014, 07:58 PM
 
Location: A subtropical paradise
2,068 posts, read 2,922,124 times
Reputation: 1359
Both cities have an immense number of palm trees, and so are pretty strong in that department. However, I choose Miami because the city showcases the diversity it has in palm trees strongly as well; Miami shows off the large variety it has in palms very well, with coconuts, royals, dates, and even ultra-tropical palms from the equator all being prominent around the city. In contrast, while LA does indeed have a high variety of palm trees, it seems that only the Washingtonias, and the dates see prominence in the city.

In addition, palm trees make a natural footprint in Miami, growing naturally, in the wild, all throughout South Florida. In contrast, LA, and the rest of Coastal California do not have native palm trees; the Washingtonias are found only in the desert canyons and oases of the state. The natural footprint left by the palms is something that even Savannah, GA, and Charleston, SC, have over LA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2014, 08:12 PM
 
14,256 posts, read 26,927,598 times
Reputation: 4565
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheese plate View Post
Why exactly?
Echoing LA Mex, palms are so ingrained in the imagery associated with Los Angeles. Imagine Hollywood Boulevard covered in Oak trees. No thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2014, 09:06 PM
 
Location: Miami/ Washington DC
4,836 posts, read 12,003,827 times
Reputation: 2595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobloblawslawblog View Post
"Very few can live in L.A."? Have you ever been to L.A.? You can't throw a rock from any point in the city without hitting a palm tree. They are everywhere in that town. Many of the streets, both small residential streets and main thoroughfares are lined with them. You even see them along some of the freeways.

Miami may have a greater variety of different species of palms, but the Washingtonia palms (that are native to the Southern CA desert) are all over the place in L.A. Some reaching heights of 100 feet. There are many Mediterranean date palms as well.

Miami wins for variety of species, but I'd say it's a tie for actual number of trees.
Palma are not natural to LA. They are in Miami. It is as simple as that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2014, 09:19 PM
 
Location: Who Cares, USA
2,341 posts, read 3,594,946 times
Reputation: 2258
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyMIA View Post
Palma are not natural to LA. They are in Miami. It is as simple as that.
Once again, read more closely what I wrote there. I said that they are native to the Southern California DESERT. Not the city of Los Angeles.

Simple as that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2014, 09:35 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
2,412 posts, read 2,472,472 times
Reputation: 531
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyMIA View Post
Palma are not natural to LA. They are in Miami. It is as simple as that.
they have become natural, they even grow in the cracks in between sidewalks and freeways. empty lots are full of little palms that werent planted instead other plams nearby drop their seeds and they grow in open spaces like crazy.

https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9739...-qA1VdAn9w!2e0

here is an example, next to the train tracks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2014, 09:39 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
2,412 posts, read 2,472,472 times
Reputation: 531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yn0hTnA View Post
Both cities have an immense number of palm trees, and so are pretty strong in that department. However, I choose Miami because the city showcases the diversity it has in palm trees strongly as well; Miami shows off the large variety it has in palms very well, with coconuts, royals, dates, and even ultra-tropical palms from the equator all being prominent around the city. In contrast, while LA does indeed have a high variety of palm trees, it seems that only the Washingtonias, and the dates see prominence in the city.

In addition, palm trees make a natural footprint in Miami, growing naturally, in the wild, all throughout South Florida. In contrast, LA, and the rest of Coastal California do not have native palm trees; the Washingtonias are found only in the desert canyons and oases of the state. The natural footprint left by the palms is something that even Savannah, GA, and Charleston, SC, have over LA.
queen palms are also very prominent in LA's cityscape. our big 3 are the fan palm, CIDP, and Queen.

What the Fan palm is to LA, the Royal is to Miami. so i think the dominance is about equal with these two palms dominating their respective city
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2014, 12:07 AM
 
14,256 posts, read 26,927,598 times
Reputation: 4565
Yeah, I would think years of palm seeds seeping into cracks and driveways of Los Angeles, would cause palms to grow wild throughout Los Angeles. At this point, palms might as well be viewed as native to Los Angeles. Why try to get rid of that image at this point, when they can grow wildly through concrete urban areas in Los Angeles?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top