Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Then why on the San Diego, Los Angeles, and San Francisco forums do the majority of the posters making threads like "wanting to move to Cali" always come from NYC?
I've never really given any weight to the idea of the "Great Lakes" mega-region. It's essentially every major Midwestern city, even if they're hundreds of miles away from the Great Lakes. If a city as far away as Kansas City can be included, just call the mega-region the Midwest.
It will always be Bos-Wash. You might as well ask what will France's main city be in 2050. I'll give you a hint: it's not Lyon.
Sure, but the US really has no "main" city. The US has a "largest" city but most of the country doesnt look to the Northeast the way France looks to Paris for virtually everything.
So by 2050, BosWash may be the largest megaregion but the fact that the US has several such regions means no single region dominates, which makes sense.
Sure, but the US really has no "main" city. The US has a "largest" city but most of the country doesnt look to the Northeast the way France looks to Paris for virtually everything.
So by 2050, BosWash may be the largest megaregion but the fact that the US has several such regions means no single region dominates, which makes sense.
Great point. NYC is not America's cultural or political or financial center the way London, Paris and Amsterdam are for their respective countries. Sure, NYC LEADS in all those categories, but outside of Washington D.C. (politically), no one city dominates nationally.
In this way the U.S. is akin to India and Brazil with their many cities sharing cultural, political and financial clout...all federal democracies too.
2050 isn't too far away and it seems unlikely that BosWash would be exceeded in population by any of the other megalopolises in such a short time frame. Maybe a bit further out from in time would have the California megalopolis from Sacramento down to San Diego and over the border to Tijuana or with the agglomeration of the Texas Triangle and the Gulf Coast as one megalopolis (though by having such a large spread for a megalopolis comes the argument that the Piedmont Atlantic and the Northeast could be considered part of the same megalopolis at that point).
I think it's interesting to see people that believe Texas will somehow grow to 60,000,000 people in 35 years ...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.