Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Premier city of the Great Lakes Region?
Chicago and its entire extended area Greater Chicago/Chicagoland 86 60.14%
Toronto and its entire extended area the Greater Golden Horseshoe 40 27.97%
Tie 17 11.89%
Voters: 143. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-17-2015, 09:33 PM
 
Location: Gatineau, Québec
26,883 posts, read 38,047,932 times
Reputation: 11651

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red John View Post
Not sure, because I lived in Chicago, I am accustomed to talking about it here with people. With Toronto, because I never lived there, I haven't discussed it yet with anyone. I'll have to ask some of the people I know here but they do have a far more favorable opinion of Canada as a country to the United States. Most would rather take up residence in Canada than America from what I've heard so far, though those same most would also entertain a few select spots in America too. Most would rather visit America than Canada though, it offers more to see and people are genuinely intrigued by some American cities (namely from what I can tell New York, Miami, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Boston) but have a low opinion of much of the rest. Even though people show interest in Los Angeles, most people that I have talked to that haven't been want to see it, but some of them still hold stigmatized opinions of Los Angeles and often trash it for some of its superficial (often fictional) characteristics. Really the only American cities with a clean and reputable image out here from what I can tell so far are New York, Boston, and San Francisco.
t.
Yeah, I think there is quite a bit of truth in the idea that Canada has a better reputation than the U.S. worldwide, but part of it is because most people are vague on the details about Canada.

The U.S., for all its faults, is way more well known to people worldwide, and also seen by most as more interesting IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-17-2015, 09:52 PM
 
Location: Gatineau, Québec
26,883 posts, read 38,047,932 times
Reputation: 11651
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
Outside of U.S./Canada, I think Montreal is still slightly better known than Toronto. This will probably change with time, but if you ask a random person worldwide, I think they would be slightly more familar with Montreal, and would guess it is Canada's primate city.
I'd say that overall around the world, Toronto and Montreal are pretty equal in terms of renown as Canada's primate city. Which is saying something when you consider that Toronto's metro has 2 million more people than Montreal, making it close to 50% larger.

But it varies greatly according to where you are in the world. Anywhere in the world where people speak French, Montreal is THE Canadian city. So this covers off a chunk of Europe and of course much of Africa and the Middle East. On the other hand, you'd find Montreal is very much off the radar (or at least, no more on it and maybe less than Calgary or Ottawa) in countries like India and China. Both of which have a huge chunk of the world's population.

Toronto and Montreal are probably fairly equal in renown in non-francophone Europe (except for the British Isles) and also equal in Latin America IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2015, 01:26 AM
 
2,506 posts, read 3,380,612 times
Reputation: 2713
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticman View Post
Say whaaaaa??? The Chicago MSA and CSA are both FAR larger in area than either Toronto's CMA or the GTA.

The Chicago CSA is 10,856 sq. miles!

Only the Greater Golden Horseshoe is comparable in size of area to The Chicago CSA.
A huge chunk of the Chicago metro area is farmland...I don't know the exact statistics, but an armchair guess is 50% of the metro area is rural and has maybe 5 percent of the population.

example Newton and Jasper counties in Northwest Indiana are 1000 square miles with just 50,000 people , .5% of the metro population compromising 10% of the land. Other huge swaths of the metro are similarly rural and are lumped into the metro area.

And Red John, your concern for Chicago's well-being and global reputation is considerate...but considering there is record tourism levels, hotels now sprouting like weeds, new tower proposals rolling in every few days including3 supertalls, dozens of companies moving their headquarters to the core booming neighborhoods on all sides of the city, an exploding tech scene, Northerly Island Park, the 606, the Lucas Museum, the Riverwalk...and just a few weeks ago, the announcement of a new feather in Chicago's Cultural Cap, the Museum of American Literature is on its way. Maybe you should expend your noble efforts in a city more in need of your benevolence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2015, 02:07 PM
 
Location: Green Country
2,868 posts, read 2,821,788 times
Reputation: 4798
Quote:
Originally Posted by ARrocket View Post
Racine is not a Chicago suburb. It's included in Milwaukee's CSA.
Racine is 77mi and 1h23m from Chicago. Fort Erie (in the Golden Horseshoe) is 104 miles and 1h37m by car from Toronto. Yet nobody here complains when Fort Erie is added to Toronto's grossly overexaggerated population size. So what's good for the geese is good for the gander. If you want to give Toronto the area around Niagara Falls, then you have to be willing to consider Racine as an extended part of Chicagoland.



Fun fact time! Toronto to Fort Erie, ON (both in the "Golden Horseshoe") is LONGER in distance than Chicago to Milwaukee! Chicago to Milwaukee is 92 miles and takes 1h28 minutes, 8 miles closer (and 9 minutes closer) to Chicago than Fort Erie is to Toronto. So, again, if you want me to shrink Chicago, then I think it's only fair that the Golden Horseshoe be shrunk as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2015, 02:36 PM
 
Location: Green Country
2,868 posts, read 2,821,788 times
Reputation: 4798
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigLake View Post
Wow, that's great insight. Is this verified to be true? I had no idea that Toronto incorporated such a geographically vast area when compiling it CSA (MSA?). That's a *huge* area (2,750sqmi). If Chicago were to broaden its CSA to such a vast size, it would probably add another 2-3 million in population, right?
Yeah, Chicago at 2,750sqmi would add Lake's 0.7 million + Northern Will's 0.6 million + Kane's 0.5 million + Kenosha's 0.2 million. So it would add 2 million exactly. So it would have 8 million + in the same land area as Toronto has 6 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2015, 06:18 PM
 
Location: Chicago
4,745 posts, read 5,575,707 times
Reputation: 6009
Quote:
Originally Posted by manitopiaaa View Post
Yeah, Chicago at 2,750sqmi would add Lake's 0.7 million + Northern Will's 0.6 million + Kane's 0.5 million + Kenosha's 0.2 million. So it would add 2 million exactly. So it would have 8 million + in the same land area as Toronto has 6 million.
Chicago has 9.2 million people living in 2647 square miles. That's more than the entire Golden Horseshoe in a fraction of the land area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2015, 09:07 PM
 
Location: Toronto
15,102 posts, read 15,887,502 times
Reputation: 5202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago South Sider View Post
Chicago has 9.2 million people living in 2647 square miles. That's more than the entire Golden Horseshoe in a fraction of the land area.

The GTA has 6.5 million people in 883 sq miles of urbanized area (link below).. The majority of the 2647 square miles people are throwing around is not urban and are green areas/marshland. I could easily eliminate marshland north of Vaughn and supplement Hamilton to the west (which is contiguous to the GTA but not officially a part of it because Canada and the U.S don't measure metro areas in the same manner) and add another half million for example. We can all get into the picking and choosing of populated parts of large areas to use advantageously one way or the other to skew results...


If current growth rates continue for the GTA (which most likely will be the case due to Canada's immigration policy and GTA being by far the immigration magnet city of a country to the tune of 40 percent of its 250K immigants per year), by 2041 it will have 9.4 million in 883 sq miles.. In the Canamerican sense, that is incredibly dense and compact! I think even now Chicago may be hard pressed to fit 6.5 million people into 883 sq miles anywhere - even at its most dense and urban.

In terms of urban areas right now (not CSA/Golden horseshoe regional type comparisons, just urban areas between the two) Chicago has 9.2 million in 2647 sq miles of urban area with a population density of 3400 ppsm vs the GTA's 6.5 million in 883 sq miles with 7300 ppsm.

Moderator cut: link removed, linking to competitor sites is not allowed


http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/economy/...s/projections/


Quote:
Originally Posted by North 42 View Post
I agree with you, I would love to know just what exactly came off as passive aggressive?

what is it with all this 'passive aggressive' nonsense.. A lot of armchair shrinks in C/D it would seem..

Last edited by Yac; 12-09-2015 at 06:53 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2015, 09:37 PM
 
Location: Toronto
15,102 posts, read 15,887,502 times
Reputation: 5202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
I'd say that overall around the world, Toronto and Montreal are pretty equal in terms of renown as Canada's primate city. Which is saying something when you consider that Toronto's metro has 2 million more people than Montreal, making it close to 50% larger.

But it varies greatly according to where you are in the world. Anywhere in the world where people speak French, Montreal is THE Canadian city. So this covers off a chunk of Europe and of course much of Africa and the Middle East. On the other hand, you'd find Montreal is very much off the radar (or at least, no more on it and maybe less than Calgary or Ottawa) in countries like India and China. Both of which have a huge chunk of the world's population.

Toronto and Montreal are probably fairly equal in renown in non-francophone Europe (except for the British Isles) and also equal in Latin America IMO.
The metro population of Toronto and Montreal is a bit weird if you go by CMA's but the Greater Montreal area is about 4.2 million. The Greater Toronto Area is at 6.5 million but this doesn't include Hamilton and other cities that are contiguous to the GTA. Its pretty safe to say Toronto anchors a region with double the population of Montreal with the gap widening in Toronto's favour given growth rates over the last few years coupled with projections.


As for International renown, its really difficult to capture that as its anecdotal.. Montreal historically was the more important city and for far longere. With that said, Toronto now is obviously the largest economic city in the country by far, brings in substantially more immigrants and has an airport that is much more internationally connected and far busier than Montreal.. Toronto has links to more cities in Europe, Asia and South America than Montreal.. The only continent Montreal would compete with in terms of air connectivity is Africa. In addition, Toronto receives substantially more International visitors than Montreal so on paper Toronto checks off premier much more potently than Montreal.

Last edited by fusion2; 11-22-2015 at 09:56 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2015, 10:59 PM
 
Location: Toronto
15,102 posts, read 15,887,502 times
Reputation: 5202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Average Fruit View Post
Race and ethnicity is not the same thing. Two people can be of the same race but be of different Ethnicities.

Toronto is more ethnically diverse than Chicago, while Chicago is more racially balance.

Toronto is more ethnically diverse and of various different ethnicities there are stronger numbers and not as generationally assimilated as in Chicago - they are more in your face in terms of expressing their culture ..


This is a celebration in Chicago when Spain wins the world cup



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvhyuGDjEWo


This is a celebration in Toronto when Spain wins the world cup



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0KkK4ljUzU


Even though Chicago has a larger African Canamerican population than Toronto - because Toronto has a heavy number of more recent Caribbean Blacks - this is a celebration of black multiculturalism in Toronto....



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dayr5XQi1Rw

Last edited by fusion2; 11-22-2015 at 11:45 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2015, 03:56 AM
 
Location: Gatineau, Québec
26,883 posts, read 38,047,932 times
Reputation: 11651
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusion2 View Post
The metro population of Toronto and Montreal is a bit weird if you go by CMA's but the Greater Montreal area is about 4.2 million. The Greater Toronto Area is at 6.5 million but this doesn't include Hamilton and other cities that are contiguous to the GTA. Its pretty safe to say Toronto anchors a region with double the population of Montreal with the gap widening in Toronto's favour given growth rates over the last few years coupled with projections.


As for International renown, its really difficult to capture that as its anecdotal.. Montreal historically was the more important city and for far longere. With that said, Toronto now is obviously the largest economic city in the country by far, brings in substantially more immigrants and has an airport that is much more internationally connected and far busier than Montreal.. Toronto has links to more cities in Europe, Asia and South America than Montreal.. The only continent Montreal would compete with in terms of air connectivity is Africa. In addition, Toronto receives substantially more International visitors than Montreal so on paper Toronto checks off premier much more potently than Montreal.
Agreed. That's why it's surprising, when you travel around many parts of the world (not all of them of course), to find how close Montreal still is to Toronto in many people's minds. Part of it is past glory as you say, but there are other factors as well that are more superficial: the 1976 Olympics (both past glory and superficial), the F1 Grand Prix race, the sharing of the Canadian Open tennis tournament with Toronto, perhaps a clearer global image as an outlier ''French'' (sic) city in North America, etc.

Last edited by Acajack; 11-23-2015 at 04:54 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top