Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-25-2016, 10:19 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,515 posts, read 33,531,365 times
Reputation: 12152

Advertisements

As a Rangers fan, I really wish the Astros were still in the NL Central. Milwaukee should have been move back to the AL.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-25-2016, 10:25 PM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,898,942 times
Reputation: 7643
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
As a Rangers fan, I really wish the Astros were still in the NL Central. Milwaukee should have been move back to the AL.
Ditto.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2016, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Arch City
1,724 posts, read 1,858,750 times
Reputation: 846
I'd say St. Louis and Chicago probably have one of the oldest sports rivalries ever. The Cardinals-Cubs rivalry goes back close to or over 100 years. Not to mention the Blues and Blackhawks have a rivalry that's existed since 1967.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2016, 03:28 PM
 
6,772 posts, read 4,514,172 times
Reputation: 6097
The Lakers/Celtics rivalry from the 1980's immediately came to my mind. Totally different cities on opposite coasts. Couldn't get any better than that!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2016, 06:44 PM
 
Location: The Mid-Cities
1,085 posts, read 1,789,739 times
Reputation: 698
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coseau View Post
I remember when Houston had the Oilers football team in the AFC Central with the Cincinnati Bengals, Cleveland Browns, and Pittsburgh Steelers. Because it was it was such a change of pace and different city then the other 3 cities it made more intriguing and interesting especially when Houston had to come up north in the winter snow to play or the Steelers, Bengals and Browns had to go down and play in the Astrodome. On top of that the Houston Astros baseball team was in the NL central with the Cincinnati Reds, Chicago Cubs, St Louis Cardinals, and Pittsburgh Pirates. When all the cities are kinda similar and close proximity to each other you kinda need a change a pace to keep things lively and interesting. I kind of miss that rivalry. Sort of similar to the Dallas Cowboys being in the NFC East.
Yup, it's and oddball that should be repeated in the AFC, as well as other sports. It throws off the NFC East because it's an outsider that doesn't belong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 07:46 AM
 
Location: Rochester NY
1,962 posts, read 1,816,675 times
Reputation: 3542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moboy32 View Post
Kansas City vs Oakland
Good one! No real strong interest in either team but I always enjoy watching them play each other. But if I had to root for one I'd go with KC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 07:49 AM
 
Location: KCMO
638 posts, read 623,868 times
Reputation: 532
Kansas City vs Oakland
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 07:51 AM
 
Location: Rochester NY
1,962 posts, read 1,816,675 times
Reputation: 3542
Other good one I thought of was the Buffalo Bill and Miami Dolphins. Can't really get much different than Buffalo and Miami, but the hate between teams is definitely there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 08:16 AM
 
14,020 posts, read 15,011,523 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by LookingtoGoSomewhere View Post
Most Bruins fans were born in 2011 after their Cup, that's why.

There is a huge bandwagon element to Boston sports nobody ever talks about.

We wouldn't be seeing half the Boston fans we do now without their success.
That's true everywhere, it was not long ago that the Blackhawks were averaging under 12,000 fans/game. The TD Garden never had more than 2,000 empty seats.
Or the Yankees and Phillies playing to half empty stadiums?
Boston and Buffalo historically have been the best TV markets for the NHL going back decades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 09:03 AM
 
14,020 posts, read 15,011,523 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by LookingtoGoSomewhere View Post
Couple things.

1) MLB should not have built all these stadiums with all these seats in the first place. Over 40,000 seats is ridiculous. More than half of MLB teams don't even fill half capacity whereas the NBA and NHL have 90% of teams selling out, at least these days.

2) For such a "great" hockey town, the Bruins have a very wonky attendance history going back decades, and yes, I have followed hockey since the 90's and I am aware of seating capacities and arenas. Boston underwhelmed up until 2011. I have friends who live there that are self-proclaimed fans because of 2011.
That may be a good thing now to attract fans, but before? The Bruins simply didn't sell out.

Boston Bruins yearly attendance at hockeydb.com

3) While I don't give the Blackhawks or Bruins a pass for their attendance woes (especially since they're O6 teams) the Blackhawks had a terrible owner named Dollar Bill Wirtz who traded away all their popular stars, increased ticket prices and did not broadcast the team locally. The Blackhawks weren't broadcasted locally until the 2007 season for the first time in their long history, which is mind-boggling and shocking. Instead, the fans went to the Chicago Wolves AHL team instead and folllowed them in protest. I do agree to an extent, neither is acceptable.

But things for Boston teams aren't as peachy keen as you make them out to be.

The local tv ratings for the Bruins and Celtics were embarrassing until they won titles and there are a number of articles from players calling out Celtics fans for being fairweather fans like Mike Bibby, local talk radio discussing the Patriots and Red Sox 90% of the time while the other two are an afterthought.
The whole "when cities I like have bad attendance its a protest" meme is dumb.
The Bruins have one 1 title since 1974. They have consistently been paying into profit sharing since it started.
The Blackhawks, Penguins, and Islanders at some point in the last 15 years were dead last in attendance in the NHL, nobody calls Chicago or Pittsburgh or NYC a "bandwagon sports town." In fact the Bruins weathered their downturn better than any those teams.
You just don't like either Boston or its sports teams or both.
There is a reason that Boston is home to 3/4 Best Rivalries in American Sports (Habs/Bs, Yanks/Red Sox, Celtics/Lakers)

Last edited by btownboss4; 07-28-2016 at 09:15 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top