Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-17-2016, 07:07 PM
 
Location: Washington, DC area
11,108 posts, read 23,949,107 times
Reputation: 6438

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kingtutaaa View Post
Not much talk about Baltimore on this thread but it seems too be more happening than it appears . YES Baltimore seems to be on the rebound .
Baltimore is on a huge rebound. There are cranes all over downtown. The skyline is rapidly changing. Very few people seem to know how much is going on in Baltimore including locals.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
Kind of surprised by DC. Is the private sector there growing that rapidly? It's clearly not the government.
The space the government leases has shrunk considerably over the past few years. Just shows how diverse DC really is. It's not all government. The growth in DC is crazy. I can't even begin to keep up with everything going on in DC. I don't know how anybody can.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-17-2016, 10:02 PM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,141 posts, read 7,612,515 times
Reputation: 5796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
Kind of surprised by DC. Is the private sector there growing that rapidly? It's clearly not the government.
There is considerable construction going on throughout the DMV I can assure you that. No not all probably not even half is "government" related. This region is/has become a Goliath in terms of business activity in the US, much like Dallas, Chicago etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2016, 06:56 AM
 
37,904 posts, read 42,096,313 times
Reputation: 27325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
Kind of surprised by DC. Is the private sector there growing that rapidly? It's clearly not the government.
So far this year, total non-farm employment has grown at an annualized rate of 2.04 percent, adding an estimated 11,700 new jobs. This compares to 7,370 jobs created in 2015. Of the jobs created so far in 2016, 6,430 of them were in office-using sectors of the economy. The government sector has seen the greatest increase so far in 2016, adding an estimated 5,270 new jobs. While significant, the office market is not currently receiving new demand from these jobs as the General Services Administration is still trying to shrink the Federal Government’s leasing footprint. In fact, it is expected that, as Federal leases roll, their space requirements could decrease by as much as 15 percent...

Currently, there is 4.0 million square feet of space under construction, and at the end of the third quarter 61.4 percent of the space was committed. This leasing activity, in most cases, is not new demand but rather relocations from other product in the market. As a result, large blocks of space will be left behind as tenants relocate into their new offices...

Additionally, with redevelopments, demolitions and renovations being so prevalent, vacancy has been pushed to the future. Given all the leading indicators, demand for office space is expected to grow, but at a slower rate than new supply is being brought to the market. As a result, the overall vacancy rate is expected to rise, and if redevelopment activity stops as the demand for high-end space softens, they could rise to over 15 percent during the next three years.
| Washington DC | Colliers International
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2016, 10:19 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,742 posts, read 15,816,449 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
Kind of surprised by DC. Is the private sector there growing that rapidly? It's clearly not the government.
New Class A office is being built and Class B and Class C office is being converted to residential in downtown DC. This is a very significant time period for the District of Columbia as it represents a beginning shift from office only ghettos to residential mixed use buildings.

Over the next 10 years, D.C.'s downtown will not only triple in size as all the sub-markets converge on each other to make one giant mass, but downtown will finally begin to change toward more of a mixed use which is badly needed. The more new office the spreads to NOMA, Union Market, Northwest One, Capital Riverfront, The Wharf, Buzzed Point, and the SW Eco District, the more space opens up in the older parts of downtown DC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2016, 10:29 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,742 posts, read 15,816,449 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
So far this year, total non-farm employment has grown at an annualized rate of 2.04 percent, adding an estimated 11,700 new jobs. This compares to 7,370 jobs created in 2015. Of the jobs created so far in 2016, 6,430 of them were in office-using sectors of the economy. The government sector has seen the greatest increase so far in 2016, adding an estimated 5,270 new jobs. While significant, the office market is not currently receiving new demand from these jobs as the General Services Administration is still trying to shrink the Federal Government’s leasing footprint. In fact, it is expected that, as Federal leases roll, their space requirements could decrease by as much as 15 percent...

Currently, there is 4.0 million square feet of space under construction, and at the end of the third quarter 61.4 percent of the space was committed. This leasing activity, in most cases, is not new demand but rather relocations from other product in the market. As a result, large blocks of space will be left behind as tenants relocate into their new offices...

Additionally, with redevelopments, demolitions and renovations being so prevalent, vacancy has been pushed to the future. Given all the leading indicators, demand for office space is expected to grow, but at a slower rate than new supply is being brought to the market. As a result, the overall vacancy rate is expected to rise, and if redevelopment activity stops as the demand for high-end space softens, they could rise to over 15 percent during the next three years.
| Washington DC | Colliers International
We need to really hope that vacancy remains high for as long as possible so developers continue to choose residential new construction and continue to convert vacant office buildings to residential. It represents the perfect storm to change downtown DC.

Height limits are to blame for the office ghetto created in the 1950-1980's because developers needed to squeeze as much profit as they could out of the height allowed. Now with the expansion of downtown headed out in all directions, developers of older office buildings in the older parts of downtown are trying to go residential which has MAJOR implication's for D.C's downtown.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2016, 10:44 AM
 
Location: In the heights
37,273 posts, read 39,596,627 times
Reputation: 21340
It's interesting that Chicago, while doing alright, isn't exactly booming and yet it has a huge amount of office space under construction. What are the underlying reasons for that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2016, 11:21 AM
 
151 posts, read 125,099 times
Reputation: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Q3 2016 Local Markets by Office Space Under Construction
New York 11,567,853 s.f.
Dallas 10,947,382 s.f.
Washington, DC 10,224,898 s.f.
Chicago 8,376,664 s.f.
Seattle-Bellevue 7,159,557 s.f.
Silicon Valley 5,581,376 s.f.
San Francisco 4,435,830 s.f.
Nashville 3,981,918 s.f.
Philadelphia 3,866,458 s.f.
Atlanta 3,781,397 s.f.
Denver 3,649,889 s.f.
Houston 3,224,356 s.f.
Charlotte 2,491,211 s.f.
Austin 2,221,861 s.f.
Salt Lake City 2,122,795 s.f.
Los Angeles 2,092,795 s.f.
Orange County 1,930,680 s.f.
Baltimore 1,888,432 s.f.
Boston 1,867,642 s.f.
Raleigh-Durham 1,833,068 s.f.
Phoenix 1,692,140 s.f.
Portland 1,605,421 s.f.
Fort Worth 1,222,951 s.f.
San Francisco Peninsula 1,215,839 s.f.
Miami 989,041 s.f.
Columbus 737,000 s.f.
San Antonio 728,077 s.f.
Detroit 418,334 s.f.
Pittsburgh 412,000 s.f.
Indianapolis 372,977 s.f.
Hampton Roads 287,858 s.f.
Cincinnati 260,000 s.f.
Oakland-East Bay 250,000 s.f.
Minneapolis 249,500 s.f.
Sacramento 239,770 s.f.
Cleveland 197,000 s.f.
San Diego 188,435 s.f.
New Jersey 170,445 s.f.
Orlando 135,000 s.f.
St. Louis 125,000 s.f.
Milwaukee 110,000 s.f.
Fort Lauderdale 94,817 s.f.
Richmond 60,000 s.f.
Westchester County 0 s.f.
West Palm Beach 0 s.f.
Tampa Bay 0 s.f.
North San Francisco Bay 0 s.f.
Louisville 0 s.f.
Long Island 0 s.f.
Jacksonville 0 s.f.
Fairfield County 0 s.f.

Office market statistics, trends and outlook | Q3 2016
Schuylkill Yards should boost this considerably in time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2016, 12:27 PM
 
1,851 posts, read 2,178,995 times
Reputation: 1283
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
It's interesting that Chicago, while doing alright, isn't exactly booming and yet it has a huge amount of office space under construction. What are the underlying reasons for that?
There's more demand than some people would like to acknowledge. You don't build 1,000 ft. skyscrapers if there isn't demand for space. Chicago's losing those of the lower classes and replacing them with more affluent individuals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2016, 02:11 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, New York
5,466 posts, read 5,728,963 times
Reputation: 6098
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradjl2009 View Post
I'm surprised New Jersey is that low, especially if that includes the entire state.
Outside of Jersey City, and maybe Newark, you can't build anything in NJ. The most anti-development state for sure, and it wouldn't change at least until Christie leaves office in 2018.

I guess they'd just have to keep increasing taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2016, 02:20 PM
 
37,904 posts, read 42,096,313 times
Reputation: 27325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gantz View Post
Outside of Jersey City, and maybe Newark, you can't build anything in NJ.
You forgot Camden:

Revised Camden Waterfront Master Plan Receives Approval - Curbed Philly

Philadelphia 76ers open training facility in Camden (PHOTOS) | NJ.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top