Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think the ones that shock me the most, but pleasantly so are Colorado Springs and El Paso getting votes. It seems that I'm hearing more and more about corporate power out of El Paso and people flying there for business. This would have shocked me 5 years ago when I thought it was just another desert town struggling to stay on the map.
CO Springs I think could have huge potential given it's geography and given the huge growth of nearby Denver.
Santa Fe, love that place. Not sure if it's poised for explosive growth but it sure is more charming and fun than I gave it credit for a while back when I lived in Birmingham.
I voted Louisville. Richmond is what came to mind first, but I found my visit there this summer a bit disappointing, especially in terms of nightlife and vibrancy.
Where'd you go and what did you do? Richmond is not wanting for vibrancy and has the most diverse and complete nightlife base of any city in Virginia, with multiple nightlife areas...
Since relevancy is going to have a strong dependency on growth rate and size, I've assembled the list and ranks below. Cities are ordered in terms of current MSA annual growth rate since 2010, followed by their 2017 MSA population. I've given each city a ranking for each metric, and objectively, when added together, the lowest number wins.
While CO. Springs metro is certainly growing at a healthy clip, Im not sure it will ever gain much relevancy on the national stage as it will always play second fiddle to nearby Denver. Of those on the poll, i would say Richmond and Louisville, not because of explosive population growth, but because i think Americans are starting to appreciate these historic and charming mid-size cities that seem to be re-branding themselves as an attractive places to live, work and play. The fact that these two cities are even in the conversation about pro-level sports expansion speaks volumes, relative to their size.
Last edited by Bellside High; 08-29-2018 at 06:04 PM..
While CO. Springs metro is certainly growing at a healthy clip, Im not sure it will ever gain much relevancy on the national stage as it will always play second fiddle to nearby Denver. Of those on the poll, i would say Richmond and Louisville, not because of explosive population growth, but because i think Americans are starting to appreciate these historic and charming mid-size cities that seem to be re-branding themselves as an attractive places to live, work and play. The fact that these two cities are even in the conversation about pro-level sports expansion speaks volumes, relative to their size.
Is that last sentence true? Do you know for which leagues that this is the case?
Another update: I'm not going to redefine or try to clear up Midsized or Relevant. Interpret them how you wish.
You can get an idea of what midsized means by the cities in the list, sure many were not included because they dont have a chance.
Yes I can understand how Santa Fe with 83,000 residents and a 3.6% growth rate(not considering the dismal growth rates of Memphis and Bham) would fit this criteria. Where places likes Des Moines, Madison, Grand Rapids, and Omaha which have several more times the people, and 2 to 3 times the growth rate wouldn't stand a chance.
I voted for "other". -Jacksonville.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.