Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-02-2020, 08:03 PM
 
2,226 posts, read 1,397,867 times
Reputation: 2916

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Yes I had to calculate Texas' growth rate a few times just to make sure I wasnt mistaken. The state has been very successful at crafting an image of growth and responsive leadership when it comes to luring in high profile business from other states that I presumed at the outset that it would at or very near the top-but I was very surprised to see it actually below average for the last 5 years.

Im certain much of it is due to the global energy slowdown that occurred during this time period.
Any idea what it looks like if you do the Texas Triangle vs. the rest?

My guess (based only on hunch) is that the Texas Triangle has done as well as advertised, but the rest of the state drags down the overall numbers. Texas is larger and contains more rural areas than many of the states ahead of it. It's no secret that cities are growing and rural America is struggling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-02-2020, 10:21 PM
 
20 posts, read 13,120 times
Reputation: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Yes I had to calculate Texas' growth rate a few times just to make sure I wasnt mistaken. The state has been very successful at crafting an image of growth and responsive leadership when it comes to luring in high profile business from other states that I presumed at the outset that it would at or very near the top-but I was very surprised to see it actually below average for the last 5 years.

Im certain much of it is due to the global energy slowdown that occurred during this time period.
If you follow politic enough you would not be surprised. It disgusts me Greg Abbott (TX governor) shamelessly, keeps bragging how good TX economy on Facebook every day despite all the numbers say otherwise. Sadly many people decide to trust a politician instead of numbers from BEA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 10:53 PM
 
Location: Upper West Side, Manhattan, NYC
15,323 posts, read 23,915,941 times
Reputation: 7419
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonSJ View Post
If you follow politic enough you would not be surprised. It disgusts me Greg Abbott (TX governor) shamelessly, keeps bragging how good TX economy on Facebook every day despite all the numbers say otherwise. Sadly many people decide to trust a politician instead of numbers from BEA.
Texas does well, obviously, but the amount it does is IMO overplayed. I think it's actually most Dallas that gets a lot of the press these days. The growth rate is good, but the total GDP growth of the Dallas MSA in the last either 5 years or 8 years was almost identical to the Chicago MSA (which people believe is slacking even though it's not technically).

These areas do offer a lot but there are some companies that have expanded or will be expanding in Dallas which are getting a nice amount of jobs, but those same companies are actually fulfilling new higher paying jobs in a few other cities.

Still, I don't want to crap on Texas as it does really well, but some of the media makes you believe that every single company in existence is moving out of the Bay Area and going to Dallas which is just not true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 11:02 PM
 
Location: Upper West Side, Manhattan, NYC
15,323 posts, read 23,915,941 times
Reputation: 7419
Quote:
Originally Posted by whereiend View Post
Any idea what it looks like if you do the Texas Triangle vs. the rest?

My guess (based only on hunch) is that the Texas Triangle has done as well as advertised, but the rest of the state drags down the overall numbers. Texas is larger and contains more rural areas than many of the states ahead of it. It's no secret that cities are growing and rural America is struggling.
I'm not sure what you mean by Texas Triangle but I'm assuming Dallas, Houston, and Austin? If so, then between 2010 and 2018, those areas gained $359.7B in GDP which was a 46.3% increase. By comparison, the areas of Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Jose combined gained $703.7B between 2010 and 2018 which is a 57.5% increase. Both are amazing, but those 3 areas of CA did even better than those 3 areas of Texas.

Here's the kicker - San Francisco and San Jose areas combined resulted in a GDP increase of $388.8B from 2010 to 2018, which is nearly $30B more than the increase of the Dallas, Houston, and Austin areas combined in the same time period. That increase was 79.2% for San Francisco+San Jose areas between 2010 and 2018.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 11:21 PM
 
2,226 posts, read 1,397,867 times
Reputation: 2916
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
I'm not sure what you mean by Texas Triangle but I'm assuming Dallas, Houston, and Austin? If so, then between 2010 and 2018, those areas gained $359.7B in GDP which was a 46.3% increase. By comparison, the areas of Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Jose combined gained $703.7B between 2010 and 2018 which is a 57.5% increase. Both are amazing, but those 3 areas of CA did even better than those 3 areas of Texas.

Here's the kicker - San Francisco and San Jose areas combined resulted in a GDP increase of $388.8B from 2010 to 2018, which is nearly $30B more than the increase of the Dallas, Houston, and Austin areas combined in the same time period. That increase was 79.2% for San Francisco+San Jose areas between 2010 and 2018.
I mean it's not news that tech has exploded. No city compares to the Bay area or Seattle in GDP growth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 11:25 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
12,162 posts, read 8,002,089 times
Reputation: 10134
Quote:
Originally Posted by whereiend View Post
I mean it's not news that tech has exploded. No city compares to the Bay area or Seattle in GDP growth.
ca wa ma tech growth
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 11:30 PM
 
20 posts, read 13,120 times
Reputation: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
I'm not sure what you mean by Texas Triangle but I'm assuming Dallas, Houston, and Austin? If so, then between 2010 and 2018, those areas gained $359.7B in GDP which was a 46.3% increase. By comparison, the areas of Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Jose combined gained $703.7B between 2010 and 2018 which is a 57.5% increase. Both are amazing, but those 3 areas of CA did even better than those 3 areas of Texas.

Here's the kicker - San Francisco and San Jose areas combined resulted in a GDP increase of $388.8B from 2010 to 2018, which is nearly $30B more than the increase of the Dallas, Houston, and Austin areas combined in the same time period. That increase was 79.2% for San Francisco+San Jose areas between 2010 and 2018.
And it's even more amazing knowing that CA metros economy growing faster despite population slowing down significantly compares to TX metros. Where I live Santa Clara county (Silicon Valley) GDP per capita growth were around 9% per year It's crazy when I went to a cinema at 10 pm and the parking still 100% full. Going to a mall on holidays at 4 pm(slowest time for a restaurant) and ended up going home after spending half hour looking for parking (don't want to block traffic) I often make jokes with friends that we live in a bubble.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 11:39 PM
 
Location: Upper West Side, Manhattan, NYC
15,323 posts, read 23,915,941 times
Reputation: 7419
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonSJ View Post
And it's even more amazing knowing that CA metros economy growing faster despite population slowing down significantly compares to TX metros. Where I live Santa Clara county (Silicon Valley) GDP per capita growth were around 9% per year It's crazy when I went to a cinema at 10 pm and the parking still 100% full. Going to a mall on holidays at 4 pm(slowest time for a restaurant) and ended up going home after spending half hour looking for parking (don't want to block traffic) I often make jokes with friends that we live in a bubble.
Yeah, I mean only laymen think that GDP growth is tied directly to population growth 100%. Chicago area barely gained any population from 2010 to now and the change in GDP is basically the same as the Dallas MSA and more than Houston MSA's. People need to stop basing their entire view of any place on population and almost nothing else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2020, 04:19 AM
 
4,159 posts, read 2,847,570 times
Reputation: 5516
Quote:
Originally Posted by masssachoicetts View Post
ca wa ma tech growth
Well Dallas, Austin, and San Antonio grew faster than Boston since 2013. Actually Austin grew faster than Seattle. But Houston and the rest of Texas held the state gdp growth rate back. And no one grew like the Bay Area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2020, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Marshall-Shadeland, Pittsburgh, PA
32,616 posts, read 77,600,575 times
Reputation: 19101
Wow. Thanks for compiling all of this information. You're an asset to this forum!

California is such a beast! Wow!

It's also interesting to see that IL and PA continue to be such close peers. PA is slightly growing in terms of population while IL is slightly declining in terms of population. IL and PA are both growing by similar percentage amounts in terms of GDP, albeit IL will likely retain its comfortable lead over PA for the foreseeable future. Chicago GDP is still greater than Philadelphia + Pittsburgh GDP's combined.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top