Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-09-2009, 08:08 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, United States
4,230 posts, read 10,487,161 times
Reputation: 1444

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PT 3000 View Post
Point taken. I really am going by what the media portray's of New Orleans, I have visited during Mardi Gras but I didn't venture far enough away from my group or The french quarter to really get a feel for the city so what I have said is not meant to be personal but I like arguing every now and then, no harm meant.
me too!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-09-2009, 08:29 AM
 
Location: Jackson, MS
1,008 posts, read 3,392,184 times
Reputation: 609
It's not so much the boom "cities" that have to worry, but the boom "suburbs" do. Americans, in general, have become selfish. We take a lot of things for granted, which is why I don't necessarily think that the recession is a bad thing. Short-term, it affects a lot of people financially, but the long-term effects will benefit us all. We have to be more responsible as a society, and down time such as this will do just that. I, for one, do not mind seeing gas prices go up substantially (not because I want the oil companies to profit more, but because it makes us frugal). We have accrued more debt and health issues than any other 1st world country, because as a whole we are selfish.

Building large-scale residential developments 30-60 miles from a city core is not sustainable. It may work for a few decades, but it is doomed to fail eventually. Why should we support the building of thousands of miles of new infrastructure with our tax money when we could be investing in the existing grid we have already (and we all know the existing is deteriorating and needs technological efficiency improvements)? Why should we be pursuing virgin land and forests to develop when we have plenty of land that is in dire need of redevelopment? There is no need to continue developing these new "rings" around our cities. They will only continue to fail, just as the many neighborhoods are currently around Las Vegas. Overbuilding is a big issue in the suburbs, and it needs to be controlled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2009, 08:36 AM
 
4,574 posts, read 7,501,315 times
Reputation: 2613
You know, a lot of people would of implied that New York City would of been a present day Detroit in the 1980s. Then again, a lot of cities were following the trend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2009, 04:25 PM
 
12,823 posts, read 24,402,599 times
Reputation: 11042
The Greater San Francisco Bay Area.

Think it can't happen?

Think again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2009, 04:32 PM
 
12,823 posts, read 24,402,599 times
Reputation: 11042
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdogg817 View Post
The entire northern U.S. could be a slum one day and California? Those areas are loosing population rapidly to the south and many corporate headquaters are leaving those cities heading south.
Ding, ding, ding, ding! We have a winner.

Of course, all the elites of these places think they live on Olympus and that the flyover and SE corner of the country are toothless chumps living in double wides, burning witches out back. Elites who are full of themselves never recognize the next up and coming hot shots who will depose them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2009, 04:32 PM
 
Location: Vermont
1,475 posts, read 4,142,736 times
Reputation: 849
A lot of people don't seem to understand what a boom city is. LA and Atlanta are far from boom cities. Boom cities are cities that have boomed in the last twenty years or so. Vegas, Phoenix, Boise, Salt Lake, maybe Charlotte and Raleigh too.

Vegas is a hellhole that will go down hard. Water problems and too many people for a gambling industry that will never recover since banks are no longer letting people run up massive debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2009, 04:43 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,153 posts, read 39,404,784 times
Reputation: 21252
Quote:
Originally Posted by quickdraw View Post
A lot of people don't seem to understand what a boom city is. LA and Atlanta are far from boom cities. Boom cities are cities that have boomed in the last twenty years or so. Vegas, Phoenix, Boise, Salt Lake, maybe Charlotte and Raleigh too.

Vegas is a hellhole that will go down hard. Water problems and too many people for a gambling industry that will never recover since banks are no longer letting people run up massive debt.
If what you say about the gambling industry is true, then I hope Vegas finds a new way to sustain itself. Reno's been refocusing its economy away from gambling and has converted some casinos into apartments. Hopefully, Vegas' will sustain its shift to entertainment, the quaternary sector, and media production, make use of the vast solar resources it has, and keep on making headway with its water conservation programs. And maybe, just maybe, convert some of those hotel rooms into apartments. I'd hate to see some of those skyscrapers go to waste, and I want dibs on Luxor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2009, 04:51 PM
 
5,139 posts, read 8,849,708 times
Reputation: 5258
I would say Las Vegas and Phoenix, maybe Tampa. I don't consider Miami a boom city, but it will get worse there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2009, 04:23 AM
 
Location: Surprise, AZ
8,631 posts, read 10,148,927 times
Reputation: 7993
Quote:
Originally Posted by loveautumn View Post
I would say Las Vegas and Phoenix, maybe Tampa. I don't consider Miami a boom city, but it will get worse there.
Excellent. So would you care to explain why you would say...?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2009, 08:07 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
1,707 posts, read 2,984,180 times
Reputation: 2191
Las Vegas, Phoenix, and quite even Salt Lake City will be the next "Detroits"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top