Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What building to you think is better overall?
Flatiron Building (Atlanta) 34 28.57%
Flatiron Building (New York City) 85 71.43%
Voters: 119. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-03-2009, 08:59 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,083 posts, read 38,845,145 times
Reputation: 17006

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Galounger View Post
The Atlanta Flat Iron was the original and there's nothing like an original.
Gets my vote.
Same here. It isn't the size that makes it "better" it is the originality and design concept that makes it the more significant building. Just like anything, you don't start out with the biggest or grandest; you have to prove the concept first, then let it grow and expand. Without the Atlanta flatiron, there wouldn't BE the bigger, grander NYC flatiron.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-03-2009, 10:10 AM
 
Location: moving again
4,383 posts, read 16,760,626 times
Reputation: 1681
^^ I disagree

"flatiron" buidlings are made when an intersection is at a strange angle. The concept of the shape comes from the physical space they have to build upon. Therefor i doubt New York's Wouldn't be built if it werent for Atlanta

And i don't just like NY's more for its height, but its design is much more detailed and grand

Quote:
Originally Posted by thePR View Post
No, the first steel framed building (aka skyscraper) was Chicago's Home Insurance Building in 1884.
Actually, i was talking about the first FULL steel skyscraper skeleton

The Home insurance building "was the first building to use structural steel in its frame, but the majority of its structure was composed of cast and wrought iron"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2009, 10:11 AM
 
Location: On the Great South Bay
9,169 posts, read 13,239,989 times
Reputation: 10141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bydand View Post
Same here. It isn't the size that makes it "better" it is the originality and design concept that makes it the more significant building. Just like anything, you don't start out with the biggest or grandest; you have to prove the concept first, then let it grow and expand. Without the Atlanta flatiron, there wouldn't BE the bigger, grander NYC flatiron.
Yeah, thats why the stone wheel that the caveman invented is better than the rubber tires we use today......because it is orginial!

Joking aside, I am sorry Bydand, I do not agree with your argument here. As much as I am into history, I do not believe that the oldest or orginial of anything is necessarily better. It would mean that the oldest of buildings, the oldest cities, the oldest movies etc. are always better and newer ones will never be as good. I simply don't believe that.

I think each building has to stand on its own merits. To me the greater quality* (or as you put it the "grander" building) of the Flatiron building at 23rd street (23 skidoo!), Fifth Avenue and Broadway is far more important than a 5 year difference in age.


*I actually like both buildings
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2009, 10:30 AM
 
7,845 posts, read 20,801,231 times
Reputation: 2857
What is greater about the quality of the NYC Flatiron? Several posters have mentioned this, along with the ornate workmanship. Both buildings are quality buildings or they wouldn't be standing over 100 years later; both buildings are very ornate....one is simply taller, and one is simply a few years older.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2009, 11:29 AM
 
Location: On the Great South Bay
9,169 posts, read 13,239,989 times
Reputation: 10141
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeaconJ View Post
What is greater about the quality of the NYC Flatiron? Several posters have mentioned this, along with the ornate workmanship. Both buildings are quality buildings or they wouldn't be standing over 100 years later; both buildings are very ornate....one is simply taller, and one is simply a few years older.
Sorry Deacon, cannot help you there. You have to go online and look at pictures of both the buildings yourself to compare them. If I was able to post pictures of the NY one on this computer I would.

Why not go to your post #46 where you posted some good pictures of the Atlanta building and then look up "Flatiron Buidling". The Wickapedia site actually has a mumber of good links which shows closeups of the New York building. If after looking, you still believe the Atlanta one is better, come back and say so and I will believe you.

Thats why btw, I did not answer your post (post #39) when you questioned me. Not trying to be rude and ignore you, I was not just talking about the height of the buildings.

Last edited by LINative; 10-03-2009 at 11:38 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2009, 12:15 PM
 
Location: moving again
4,383 posts, read 16,760,626 times
Reputation: 1681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bydand View Post
Same here. It isn't the size that makes it "better" it is the originality and design concept that makes it the more significant building.
I think another good point is that The Flat Iron in Atlanta is not original either

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatiro...disambiguation
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2009, 01:28 PM
 
Location: Texas
1,365 posts, read 2,833,424 times
Reputation: 483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billiam View Post
^^ I disagree

"flatiron" buidlings are made when an intersection is at a strange angle. The concept of the shape comes from the physical space they have to build upon. Therefor i doubt New York's Wouldn't be built if it werent for Atlanta

And i don't just like NY's more for its height, but its design is much more detailed and grand



Actually, i was talking about the first FULL steel skyscraper skeleton

The Home insurance building "was the first building to use structural steel in its frame, but the majority of its structure was composed of cast and wrought iron"
That's not true. The NY version was definitely influenced after Atlanta's, and both buildings were designed by two men who were colleagues of one another.

Sure, NY might have built its own flatiron-ish building, but it's safe to say that THE Flatiron building originally belonged to Atlanta first.

Last edited by MrMcCoySays; 10-03-2009 at 02:04 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2009, 02:00 PM
 
Location: New York
11,326 posts, read 20,323,321 times
Reputation: 6231
I honestly don't believe that NYC's flatiron building was modeled after Atlanta's, they look too different, Atlanta's was first but that doesn't mean that all others dating after it were copies.


If that was the case I guess this flatiron building near where I live was modeled after Atlanta's as well .

Farmers Blvd & Bedell St, Queens, New York 11434 - Google Maps
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2009, 02:23 PM
 
Location: Texas
1,365 posts, read 2,833,424 times
Reputation: 483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infamous92 View Post
I honestly don't believe that NYC's flatiron building was modeled after Atlanta's, they look too different, Atlanta's was first but that doesn't mean that all others dating after it were copies.


If that was the case I guess this flatiron building near where I live was modeled after Atlanta's as well .

Farmers Blvd & Bedell St, Queens, New York 11434 - Google Maps
They look too different?? No way.

I mean, evidently there's a difference in height and materials, but the image is way too similar. So no offense, but it's a little naive to assume that one was built with ABSOLUTELY NO influence from the other.

Daniel Burnham designed New York's, and Bradford Gilbert designed Atlanta's. Both men were contemporaries of the Chicago school of architecture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2009, 02:30 PM
 
Location: New York
11,326 posts, read 20,323,321 times
Reputation: 6231
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMcCoySays View Post
They look too different?? No way.

I mean, evidently there's a difference in height and materials, but the image is way too similar. So no offense, but it's a little naive to assume that one was built with ABSOLUTELY NO influence from the other.

Daniel Burnham designed New York's, and Bradford Gilbert designed Atlanta's. Both men were contemporaries of the Chicago school of architecture.
It may have drew influence from Atlanta's but I wouldn't say it was modeled after Atlanta's, I wouldn't say there's zero influence but I just don't see "oooh we want one too" and just straight copied it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top