Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: which one
bay area 54 52.43%
chicagoland 49 47.57%
Voters: 103. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-27-2009, 01:21 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,526,972 times
Reputation: 21244

Advertisements

More on the income and educational attainment of Immigrants.
Foreign Born Residents(Age 25+) with a Bachelor Degree or Higher, 2008
San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland 704,010
Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City 399,233

Foreign Born Residents earning $75,000 annually, 2008

San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland 348,273
Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City 144,824

 
Old 11-27-2009, 01:32 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
4,027 posts, read 7,289,753 times
Reputation: 1333
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Also, In general immigrants have a much bigger overall influence in the Bay Area.
Probably, but I'm not sure if I completely agree with the diversity rankings.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
More on the income and educational attainment of Immigrants.
Foreign Born Residents(Age 25+) with a Bachelor Degree or Higher, 2008
San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland 704,010
Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City 399,233

Foreign Born Residents earning $75,000 annually, 2008

San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland 348,273
Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City 144,824
But percentage-wise?
 
Old 11-27-2009, 02:38 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,317 posts, read 22,385,663 times
Reputation: 18436
Default The bay area is better. Thanks for playing.

I'm originally from the Chicago area and lived there for 16 years. I reside in the bay area now and have been here for 20 years. The bay area is better, absolutely imo.

Chicagoland a good place to be until you're done with college. Great place to build a solid foundation and a good work ethic that will sustain you a lifetime. Bay area is better place to work, and a place that will adjust to you as you evolve, mature, and seek your fortune. Have a great idea and need it funded? The bay area has the type of spirit where you're likely to get financial support which is why it's the high-tech capital of the world as well as the dominant location for venture capital funding. New ideas are pursued here as aggressively as people in Chicagoland run to get out of the freezing blowing wind during the winter months. If you have a great idea in Chicagoland, it's likely to get stuck not only in the snow and bitter cold, but in analysis paralysis.

The bay area offers the highest quality of life. Chicago is a place of short summers and long cold spells, bitter people and racial segregation, a place full of hicks, squares, cornballs, and sourpusses. The bay area offers the most ideal weather, an environment that lifts the moods of its residents. Exercise, proper diet, laughter, humor, smiles from strangers, bright colors, and a general pleasantness are what you frequently encounter here. This extends life and is better for your health. More sunshine here too. I'm married, but I've met more 60 year old women here who don't look a day over 30. A place like this fosters inner peace and fulfillment and as a result, outer beauty.

The bay area is cost-prohibitive because it is such an idea place to call home. A great deal of intellectual activity here and this creates a positive, upbeat ambiance. It naturally keeps out much of the ignorant, illiterate, criminally-inclined savage element that makes Chicagoland so damn segregated. Toxicity is a way of life in Chicagoland. The bay area is far less intrusive and abrasive. The bay area is not without it's problems, but it is far better than the negatives that exist in Chicagoland.

Bay area is better, no question. Chicagoland is for masochists.
 
Old 11-27-2009, 05:00 AM
 
593 posts, read 1,762,413 times
Reputation: 314
Bay Area population: 7.4 million
Chicagoland population: 9.7 million

But the Bay Area outside of SF feels more urban than Chicagoland outside of Chicago.

Bay Area also feels more diverse, and most importantly, it has far better Mexican food!
 
Old 11-27-2009, 06:56 AM
 
787 posts, read 1,696,650 times
Reputation: 397
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcroJimmy2 View Post
Bay Area population: 7.4 million
Chicagoland population: 9.7 million

But the Bay Area outside of SF feels more urban than Chicagoland outside of Chicago.

Bay Area also feels more diverse, and most importantly, it has far better Mexican food!

How can anyone judge that? Especially when Chicago has more Mexicans than anywhere outside LA...
 
Old 11-27-2009, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,526,972 times
Reputation: 21244
Quote:
Originally Posted by thePR View Post
Probably, but I'm not sure if I completely agree with the diversity rankings.
Well, Chicago has a Non-Hispanic White Majority, the Bay Area has no majority.

Furthermore, the Bay Area has 3 groups that account for more than 20% of the total population, Chicago only has 1.

Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, 2008
Non-Hispanic White 5,531,148...56.4%
Hispanic 1,917,045...19.5%
Black 1,683,891...17.1%
Asian 502,087...5.1%
Two or More Races 114,182...1.1%
Other Race 30,445...0.3%
American Indian 11,363...0.1%
Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander 1,683...0.01%

San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland,2008
Non-Hispanic White 3,351,099...45.5%
Hispanic 1,675,758...22.7%
Asian 1,565,087...21.2%
Black 464,886...6.3%
Two Races of More 208,608...2.8%
Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander 39,020...0.5%
Other Race 31,365...0.4%
American Indian 18,621...0.2%

Quote:
But percentage-wise?
Foreign Born Residents(Age 25+) with a Bachelor Degree or Higher, 2008
San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland 704,010...32.6% of all Foreign Born Residents
Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City 399,233...23.5% of all Foreign Born Residents

Foreign Born Residents earning $75,000 annually, 2008
San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland 348,273...16.1% of all Foreign Born Residents
Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City 144,824...8.4% of all Foreign Born Residents
 
Old 11-27-2009, 10:38 AM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,515,553 times
Reputation: 5884
Quote:
Originally Posted by lakal View Post
How can anyone judge that? Especially when Chicago has more Mexicans than anywhere outside LA...
I suppose it is opinion based but I believe it to be true as well, also better and wider variety of asian food. For somebody who has eaten out a lot in both areas, it is pretty obvious call on these two for me. Chicago will win in other categories for sure as well though.
 
Old 11-27-2009, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Upper East Side, NYC
403 posts, read 1,394,474 times
Reputation: 286
SF, hands down. Much more international city. More sophisticated, more cosmopolitan. Not to mention the weather and natural beauty of the region. Look at how the market has priced these two regions. SF is much more expensive. Even with real estate values taking enormous hits in the past two years, the Bay remains one of the most expensive places in the US to live. If Chicago had more to offer, I believe the market would price this in. Is Chicago a premier city? Absolutely. It just doesnt have the panache.
 
Old 11-27-2009, 12:41 PM
 
Location: New York, NY
79 posts, read 92,074 times
Reputation: 58
Chicago is too bland and "All-Americana" for me...it doesn't have the feeling of an international city at all. I loathe the provincial midwest Chicago "scene".
 
Old 11-27-2009, 01:13 PM
 
787 posts, read 1,696,650 times
Reputation: 397
The United States is too diverse of a country for any one city to be "All-American." That would signify that there are places that are more authentically "American" than others. Unless you agree with the Palinites...


(Sounding kind of contradictory), when you leave the country, the differences between a Chicago and a San Francisco pale in comparison to the broader similarities.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top