Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: City in the South most likely to get a "Super Tower"?
Atlanta GA 71 44.94%
Miami Fl 33 20.89%
Charlotte NC 17 10.76%
New Orleans 2 1.27%
Other (please list in reply) 35 22.15%
Voters: 158. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-09-2010, 09:52 PM
 
Location: Underneath the Pecan Tree
15,982 posts, read 35,224,760 times
Reputation: 7428

Advertisements

I didn't choose because I think Miami and Atlanta could both get supertalls (well another one for Atlanta), but I see Atlanta getting it first between the two
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-09-2010, 10:34 PM
 
7,845 posts, read 20,814,775 times
Reputation: 2857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkhyperchaos View Post
That's true. Atlanta does not yet have a super tall. Bank of America Plaza's roof is only up to 933 FT. I don't consider basically a giant pole adding real height so Atlanta doesn't yet have a supertall. The only southern city which has a completed supertall is Houston. LA too if you count it as a southern city.
I guess you don't consider the spire on the Empire State Building as part of that one either then? How about the one on the Chrysler Building?

MANY buildings around the world have spires. They are part of the architectural design. Period. Maybe you're thinking about antennas?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2010, 11:17 PM
 
5,758 posts, read 11,639,313 times
Reputation: 3870
Quote:
I guess you don't consider the spire on the Empire State Building as part of that one either then? How about the one on the Chrysler Building?
Personally, no, I don't consider those spires to be part of the actual height of those structures. Just compare the Petronas Towers to the Sears Tower. The Petronas Towers have architectural spires which exceed the height of the roof of the Sears Tower, but when you compare the structures side-to-side, the Petronas Towers tend to look significantly shorter.

This is actually reflected in the height debate among tall-building enthusiasts. Some go purely by "highest occupiable floor." I'd tend to go by height of the roof, such as it is, so long as the roof has stairwell access. That does indeed mean that the "true" height of the Chrysler Building is under 1,000 feet.

Heck, if not, we might as well start counting North Dakota's several 1,500+ ft. radio towers in the supertower discussion. We might as well count smokestacks and undersea platforms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2010, 11:23 PM
 
Location: Inner Loop
789 posts, read 1,528,315 times
Reputation: 353
I personally wouldn't count a needle or anything else as part of the structural height of a building. It's not like I am going to climb the needle to get a better view, haha.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2010, 11:25 PM
 
Location: metro ATL
8,180 posts, read 14,874,493 times
Reputation: 2698
Quote:
Originally Posted by tablemtn View Post
Heck, if not, we might as well start counting North Dakota's several 1,500+ ft. radio towers in the supertower discussion. We might as well count smokestacks and undersea platforms.
If they've got human residences or offices in them, go right on ahead. If not, then they are totally different types of structures than we're considering in this thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2010, 11:44 PM
 
5,758 posts, read 11,639,313 times
Reputation: 3870
Well sure, that's the idea. Only count the areas that are usable by humans. Otherwise, you could just build a short, squat office building and top it with a gigantic "architectural spire" and claim the title of world's tallest building.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2010, 11:46 PM
 
Location: New Orleans, United States
4,230 posts, read 10,489,854 times
Reputation: 1444
IMO, if it's not part of the main structure of the building then it doesn't count. A lot of companies and cities have stuck a spire or antenna to the tops of buildings at the last minute just to claim a title.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2010, 11:48 PM
 
3,284 posts, read 3,527,160 times
Reputation: 1832
Duh, Brownsville, Tx will have the next super tall. Speculation can end here. <------
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2010, 12:00 AM
 
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex
3,260 posts, read 8,765,968 times
Reputation: 693
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestbankNOLA View Post
IMO, if it's not part of the main structure of the building then it doesn't count. A lot of companies and cities have stuck a spire or antenna to the tops of buildings at the last minute just to claim a title.
That is very true! In Dallas the Renaissance Tower went under a renovation and later they decided to put a 176 foot spire on top of the building so the building would be the 2nd tallest building in Dallas!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2010, 12:48 AM
 
Location: N/A
1,359 posts, read 3,722,899 times
Reputation: 580
Miami, obviously. There are already more skyscrapers there than most cities on the East Coast (not just the South). Atlanta would seem to be another candidate, but they don't believe in density.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top