Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education > Colleges and Universities
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-22-2010, 07:02 PM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,602,856 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

WASHINGTON, March 22 (UPI) -- Significant changes to the U.S. student loan program are in the package of fixes to the healthcare bill passed by the House and moving to the Senate.

The student aid reform package, attached to the Democrats' final amendments to the healthcare bill, would eliminate a $60 billion program that supports private student loans with federal subsidies and would replace it with government lending to students, among other things, The Washington Post reported Monday.

Student loan reform is in healthcare bill - UPI.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-22-2010, 08:37 PM
 
4,796 posts, read 22,908,339 times
Reputation: 5047
Slightly twisted synopsis, OP.

They are eliminating one program while expanding another.

What they are eliminating is the easy profit with no risk that banks gained from private student lending.

The private lending practice had none of the safety measures that federal lending programs have:

--Academic achievement measures that ensure that the school in which a student is enrolled has a record of turning out qualified graduates that can get good jobs.

--Academic progress measures to ensure that a student is actually on the path to graduation rather than merely racking up massive debt with no likelihood of repayment as a 'career student'.

--Financial responsibility that debt is actually being incurred from an academic institution (rather than a for-profit diploma mill).

--Takes away the 'sure thing' from banks who have already received plenty of 'sure things' in the form of bailout money.

Both the OP and the linked article imply that the measure will reduce the amount of financial aid available to interested students, when in fact it merely shifts the source of the aid, rather than reducing it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2010, 08:58 PM
 
Location: Beautiful New England
2,412 posts, read 7,178,364 times
Reputation: 3073
Quote:
Originally Posted by kodaka View Post
Both the OP and the linked article imply that the measure will reduce the amount of financial aid available to interested students, when in fact it merely shifts the source of the aid, rather than reducing it.
This is absolutely correct. In fact, the measure passed by Congress will produce a net savings in student loan expenses by keeping loan amounts steady but eliminate payments to banks. The money saved will then be used to provide more Pell Grants for students. Bottom line: less subsidies for bankers, more money for lower/middle income college students. For more on this, see this washingtonpost.com piece.

That's change I can believe in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2010, 08:37 PM
 
4,796 posts, read 22,908,339 times
Reputation: 5047
One other thing I'd like to add:

Banks can still offer student loans. So students who don't qualify because of their parent's income or their own, or because they are taking too long to get through school....can still get a private loan from a bank.

It's just that the repayment won't be guaranteed by the federal government. The bank will have to take on the risk themselves that the student will repay the loan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2010, 09:09 PM
 
853 posts, read 4,038,257 times
Reputation: 665
Hopefully some of the banks that offer private and federal student loans, continue to offer private student loans once they stop their federal student loan program.

Lenders that offer both types, typically need to be able to offer both types to make student lending work for them. Lenders have already starting withdrawing from student lending (although credit unions are starting to offer private loans).

I know private student loans are expensive and should only be used as a last resort. However, some students do need them (or want them!) to be able to pay for school (independent undergaduate students for example, as they can not get PLUS loans).

Also, the loss of the FFELP program is causing job loss and those people will go on unemployment (I am speaking from experience!).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education > Colleges and Universities
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top