Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Computers
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: ?
Yes 10 15.87%
No 53 84.13%
Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-06-2013, 11:06 AM
 
Location: Mableton, GA USA (NW Atlanta suburb, 4 miles OTP)
11,334 posts, read 26,081,428 times
Reputation: 3995

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dkf747 View Post
Compared to 3.1, Windows 95 did not suck. Of course, I'm the guy who also liked ME and Vista.
I still have a box in the basement running Windows 95 OSR2. The original Win95 retail release wasn't quite as good, but starting with OSR2 you got FAT32 support, and the system was somewhat more stable, at least in my experience.

The Win95 desktop was a much needed change, I think, as was the additional of dial-up TCP/IP networking so Windows folks could use real ISPs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2013, 04:36 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,446,365 times
Reputation: 7586
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcsteiner View Post
I still have a box in the basement running Windows 95 OSR2. The original Win95 retail release wasn't quite as good, but starting with OSR2 you got FAT32 support, and the system was somewhat more stable, at least in my experience.

The Win95 desktop was a much needed change, I think, as was the additional of dial-up TCP/IP networking so Windows folks could use real ISPs.
Those were great advancements but overall the whole Win9x line had severe stability issues. I switched from Win95 to NT4 in about 1997 because I was so sick of the lockups and BSoD's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2013, 06:30 PM
 
Location: Whittier
3,004 posts, read 6,273,323 times
Reputation: 3082
Maybe for free, but Windows 7 is solid for me.

Windows 8, IMO seems like a "horizontal" upgrade, er...or "side-grade." Its not bad, just not what I want.

There's only a few things like native ISO support and maybe some of the sync things, but the difference isn't big enough for me to pay for that's for sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2013, 06:45 PM
 
Location: Alexandria, VA
15,143 posts, read 27,776,049 times
Reputation: 27265
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscapeCalifornia View Post
That makes no sense.
Doesn't to me either, but apparently this Compaq was specifically built for ME - he said he had the top people at his company try to change it but it wouldn't work....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2013, 06:47 PM
 
Location: Florida
2,289 posts, read 5,773,545 times
Reputation: 5281
No, pass.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2013, 06:50 PM
 
Location: Alexandria, VA
15,143 posts, read 27,776,049 times
Reputation: 27265
Quote:
Originally Posted by ragnarkar View Post
Why is that the case? You can't boot with another OS's installation disk?
After all this time, I honestly don't remember - I still have the computer (use it as a DVD player) - I "think" I tried it with an emergency boot disk I'd gotten - not sure if I actually even have an installation disk. He told me his IT people had work had tried everything and nothing worked (that didn't stop him from not wanting to take it back and give me $$ back - sadly, it was the end of our relationship and there aren't that many family members)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2013, 09:25 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,446,365 times
Reputation: 7586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamingo13 View Post
Doesn't to me either, but apparently this Compaq was specifically built for ME - he said he had the top people at his company try to change it but it wouldn't work....
There's no such thing as a PC specifically built for any version of Windows. Now maybe they couldn't find a driver for something like the video or Ethernet for whatever OS they were trying to install on it. But that doesn't mean the system was built for only WinME. I've seen a lot of "IT people" who couldn't do the simplest things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2013, 10:45 AM
 
Location: Cushing OK
14,539 posts, read 21,254,017 times
Reputation: 16939
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldjensens View Post
Was that long ago? It does not seem like it. It crashed a lot so we stuck with DOS until some later editions of windows. I cannto remember when we switched over.
When I had 98 I loved that shell. I had some old really fun and useful programs I could still run that way. Cosmo was sooo fun to play, even if I was terrible at it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2013, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Cushing OK
14,539 posts, read 21,254,017 times
Reputation: 16939
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wardendresden View Post
Mike, I often disagree with you on the religious thread--and I do here as well--- a thousand dollars is not nearly enough to get me to upgrade to Windows 8!!!

Is it just my imagination, or does it appear that every other operating system upgrade by Microsoft just plain sucks? XP, okay; Vista, crap; Seven, okay; Eight, crap. Not sure how far back that goes, but I'm sure you operating system junkies know the history.
Back when they did DOS, one knew to run screaming from anything short of version3. Especially 0. You didn't want a free trial. Microsoft uses the public to do their main debugging and I believe it was version 2 which randomly erased hard drives. They frequently offered 'free upgrades' to unsuspecting innocents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2013, 11:05 AM
 
Location: Cushing OK
14,539 posts, read 21,254,017 times
Reputation: 16939
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldjensens View Post
I am happy to have 98, XT or 7 on any computer. All of the others have given me problems with crashes, incompatability, and other things. However I have not used 8. In fact, it is unlikely i ever will.
I have two older laptops which sort of work I kept with an eye to having them fixed and using them for writing.

One is xp. One is 98. I had a vista machine but it was stolen. The drugged out jerk had probably smashed it as soon as the internet went away (see drugged out) due to me unplugging the modem. Only sad thing about that is I hadn't recently backed up my story files. Even getting the word processor working right was complicated. It may have had a Vista glitch and he couldn't cope.

How many heavily discounted 8 machines go straight to ye old computer repair to have 8 removed and 7 installed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Computers
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top