Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Computers
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-01-2016, 10:10 AM
 
Location: McAllen, TX
5,947 posts, read 5,467,804 times
Reputation: 6747

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogarven View Post
It is a laptop. The Piriform states that I have 452 GB total which I am using 57 GB. Therefore , the HD is not overloaded at all.
Maybe you misunderstood. I never meant the hard drive was out of space. What I meant was that maybe your hard drive is not working mechanically as well as it should be. That is just one possibility if you are suffering performance issues. There are some free utilities out that you can run to check it. They may or may not help. I do not know enough about your laptop to tell you exactly what may be wrong (if anything). There are many other factors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-01-2016, 11:29 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,023,289 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by stanley-88888888 View Post
aside from being a waste of time, is there any danger from defragging an ssd ?
Firstly, it's pointless. Secondly, SSD's have limited amount of write capability, every time you write data to one you are taking a little more off it's life. They are designed to utilize blocks of memory equally so you don't end up with part of the drive dead. I would imagine by default it's going to be highly fragmented.

Also note you should not use any wiping tools on them made for HDD's, they have built in tools for this and it takes mere seconds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2016, 12:27 PM
 
Location: NJ
4,940 posts, read 12,139,900 times
Reputation: 4562
I don't think I have defragged a hard drive in over 10 years. Whenever I open up the defragger program in Windows it says my drives are 0% fragmented. I would think you need to do a significant amount of adding and deleting files for it to become fragmented.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2016, 01:05 PM
 
Location: SCW, AZ
8,301 posts, read 13,434,842 times
Reputation: 7975
You shouldn't defrag a SSD because mainly, the defragging tools do not understand the technology used within this type of drive and can do more harm then good. That said, even if a defrag application supports SSD defrag operation (typically pro versions), I have yet to see an evidence of any serious improvement from doing so.

The old school IDE/SATA drives with platters did benefit from periodic defragmentation.
But the proper procedure (imho) was to:
- Disable screensaver/active desktop
- Delete all temp/junk file plus prefetch directory (if applicable)
- Disable pagefile (virtual memory)
- Disable all startup processes, especially real-time, system resource heavy ones like AV scanners (msconfig > Boot > Safe Mode works really nice)
- Lastly, before running defrag, schedule and run Scandisk (CheckDisk)

- Run Defrag (don't forget to re-enable pagefile and any other disabled startup processes before rebooting)

Now, which drive you should NEVER run defrag on: any type of drive with encryption software on it!
That ime, is a big No-No.

Defraggler is a cool tool. I actually have its Pro version (Pro bundle of CCleaner, Recuva, etc.).
It does show and defrag SSD drives by default so I believe it supports it but I wouldn't run it.

The one I have been using for years and would easily recommend: AusLogics Disk Defrag (free)
Another really good one is SlimCleaner (free, multi-tool).
If you decide to check out SlimCleaner, download it from their site, not from Download.com which I really dislike (see screenshot).

There are 3 main variables that typically effect drive fragmentation:
- Type of drive
- The way you use the computer (installing/uninstalling, moving/deleting/copying, etc.)
- The hard drive's cluster configuration (size; larger the clusters the more likely to fragment, especially when data is moved around)
Attached Thumbnails
Defragger  Advice???-slimcleaner.png  

Last edited by TurcoLoco; 04-01-2016 at 01:23 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2016, 08:14 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,023,289 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by ansky View Post
I don't think I have defragged a hard drive in over 10 years. Whenever I open up the defragger program in Windows it says my drives are 0% fragmented. I would think you need to do a significant amount of adding and deleting files for it to become fragmented.
Have you checked the schedule? This is scheduled by default on any windows machine. I think they started that with Vista.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2016, 06:20 AM
 
10,926 posts, read 21,984,695 times
Reputation: 10569
Quote:
Originally Posted by ansky View Post
I don't think I have defragged a hard drive in over 10 years. Whenever I open up the defragger program in Windows it says my drives are 0% fragmented. I would think you need to do a significant amount of adding and deleting files for it to become fragmented.
Windows defrags on a schedule, you haven't done it but your OS has.

For those of you still clinging to the mantra of not defragging SSD's, you might want to do a bit of reading, it is not the giant no-no it's made out to be.

http://www.thewindowsclub.com/defrag...of-ssd-windows
http://lifehacker.com/windows-does-d...kay-1666753409
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/TheRea...ntYourSSD.aspx
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2016, 07:38 AM
 
3,759 posts, read 5,853,701 times
Reputation: 5537
Thanks to all that have replied to my question. I took advice and did download Auslogics defragger and it was much much quicker than Piraform. I am not a computer person and use it mostly for surfing and keeping up with people. Also, because of my work, I was dragged into the MS PC world from owning only Macs. Just trying to run cleaners and anti malware stuff and trying to keep my laptop computer from being corrupted. Thanks again for all the comments. :-)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2016, 07:57 AM
 
10,926 posts, read 21,984,695 times
Reputation: 10569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogarven View Post
Thanks to all that have replied to my question. I took advice and did download Auslogics defragger and it was much much quicker than Piraform. I am not a computer person and use it mostly for surfing and keeping up with people. Also, because of my work, I was dragged into the MS PC world from owning only Macs. Just trying to run cleaners and anti malware stuff and trying to keep my laptop computer from being corrupted. Thanks again for all the comments. :-)
My personal opinion, keep the third party junk to a minimum. Windows is perfectly capable of defragging itself, using a 3rd party tool serves no useful purpose. If you for some reason feel the unrelenting need to use a 3rd party defrag tool, make very certain that you disable the scheduled run for the Windows defragger.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2016, 09:13 AM
 
Location: Wandering.
3,549 posts, read 6,661,462 times
Reputation: 2704
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHDave View Post
My personal opinion, keep the third party junk to a minimum. Windows is perfectly capable of defragging itself, using a 3rd party tool serves no useful purpose. If you for some reason feel the unrelenting need to use a 3rd party defrag tool, make very certain that you disable the scheduled run for the Windows defragger.
Agree 100%. I do run Defraggler, but my use case is unique and doesn't apply to the average end user.

Most end users have no business running tools like CC cleaner either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2016, 10:30 AM
 
Location: SCW, AZ
8,301 posts, read 13,434,842 times
Reputation: 7975
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHDave View Post
My personal opinion, keep the third party junk to a minimum. Windows is perfectly capable of defragging itself, using a 3rd party tool serves no useful purpose. If you for some reason feel the unrelenting need to use a 3rd party defrag tool, make very certain that you disable the scheduled run for the Windows defragger.
I sort of agree and the reason for that is certain 3rd party apps do a much better job than what is (if at all) included in Windows. Windows disk defrag tool is adequate for the most part but far from great so I could see the inclination of some people to want to use something else.
That said, one thing I neglected to mention in my lost and typo-ridden post was, a 3rd-party defrag tool doesn't need to be installed, especially on the same partition as Windows.

I typically use the tool from a flash drive, that way it does a more unbiased job. If the defrag application doesn't have a portable version, install it then copy the program folder to a USB flash or external drive and then uninstall the application from Windows.

Again, a defrag tool doesn't have to be installed. Less application installed means less bloated Windows registry and a much leaner, faster, error-free system.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Skunk Workz View Post
Most end users have no business running tools like CC cleaner either.
I agree to disagree.

...or, I should say, I do not see the logic behind this. A temp/junk file cleaner, especially one as reputable as CCleaner (using default settings) should hardly warrant any concerns.

Using registry cleaner function is a different story though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Computers
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top