Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
OLED was 2x as expensive back then. If not 3. Good choice dorado.
More than 3x. Panel yield has only started to improve in the last year or 2. Costco has a great 65” OLED 4K tv on display for a price I paid for my 1080P LED 3 years ago.
Saw my first OLED TV at Target yesterday — beautiful! So much nicer than the regular LEDs. It's exactly what I'm looking for, except for the price point. Maybe there will be some good BF/CM sales.
Location: Removing a snake out of the neighbor's washing machine
3,095 posts, read 2,039,080 times
Reputation: 2305
Quote:
Originally Posted by noodlecat
Saw my first OLED TV at Target yesterday — beautiful! So much nicer than the regular LEDs. It's exactly what I'm looking for, except for the price point. Maybe there will be some good BF/CM sales.
Calibrate all of those displays to Rec 709 or other HD standard and they'll all look the same: Accurate.
Saw my first OLED TV at Target yesterday — beautiful! So much nicer than the regular LEDs. It's exactly what I'm looking for, except for the price point. Maybe there will be some good BF/CM sales.
The technology is still advancing. This time next year the 2018 models will be even better and cheaper.
Calibrate all of those displays to Rec 709 or other HD standard and they'll all look the same: Accurate.
Accuracy is one thing, color gamut is another. You can be accurate but still not reflect 100% of BT.709. I don’t think any tv comes close to BT.2020 yet.
Location: Removing a snake out of the neighbor's washing machine
3,095 posts, read 2,039,080 times
Reputation: 2305
Quote:
Originally Posted by markjames68
Accuracy is one thing, color gamut is another. You can be accurate but still not reflect 100% of BT.709. I don’t think any tv comes close to BT.2020 yet.
That's the problem: too many standards! But even calibration of just the 'basic five'(Brightness, Contrast, Color, Hue, Sharpness) and turning off all the artificial enhancers(Dynamic contrast, DNR) in Advance Settings will get the average Joe a lot closer to realism than leaving TV in the factory Vivid mode. Plus calibrated settings could lower energy consumption, and will definitely extend display life.
Athletic field turf does not look like the green of Christmas lighting, nor is David Muir's(ABC) face red as a stop sign.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But even calibration of just the 'basic five'(Brightness, Contrast, Color, Hue, Sharpness) and turning off all the artificial enhancers(Dynamic contrast, DNR) in Advance Settings will get the average Joe a lot closer to realism than leaving TV in the factory Vivid mode. Plus calibrated settings could lower energy consumption, and will definitely extend display life.
