Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Hobbies and Recreation > Cycling
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What's the reason why most don't wear helmets?
Laziness/Apathy 29 16.96%
It looks daggy/'fashion' (i.e. don't want it to mess up hair) 40 23.39%
It's for sissies 35 20.47%
Convenience 16 9.36%
Other (specify) 51 29.82%
Voters: 171. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-04-2012, 01:32 AM
 
3,463 posts, read 5,659,395 times
Reputation: 7218

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hendu View Post
After that point, I decided to observe on my daily commute who the worst bike handlers/rulebreakers are and guess what? They're the helmeted riders. The helmetless riders seem more confident in their skills and don't go on kamikaze missions through every red light.


x10

Bicycle culture in America is different than in educated and civilized countries.

I agree with everything you say here, 100%.

There are two ways to use your head when you ride ~ The "serious" NASCAR bike-training ride/Poweranger arrogantocracy are generally going to be the past and future "saved by my helmet" advocates
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-06-2012, 09:58 AM
 
Location: Lake Arlington Heights, IL
5,479 posts, read 12,261,841 times
Reputation: 2848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hendu View Post
My views on this whole topic started to change when I was in DC. My wife & I checked out bikes from the bike share station and it's not like we carry helmets every time we travel, so we proceed to ride down Pennsylvania Avenue helmetless. We're having a great time, going at a leisurely pace when some lady (wearing a helmet) on a bike buzzes us without an "on your left" warning. Up ahead, she almost wipes out when she gets all wobbly doing a head check before going around a couple right turning cars. No taking the lane hand signal of course. So at this point I'm determined to catch up with her to let her know she's riding like an idiot. Her response? "You're not wearing a helmet."

After that point, I decided to observe on my daily commute who the worst bike handlers/rulebreakers are and guess what? They're the helmeted riders. The helmetless riders seem more confident in their skills and don't go on kamikaze missions through every red light. Of course, this isn't scientific data and there are exceptions (like the helmetless old guys and teenagers who ride illegally on the sidewalk).

Basically, all of this focus on helmets is pretty much focusing on the symptom rather than the disease. I don't want to have to wear body armor just to hop on a bike. I'd gladly make a deal requiring cyclists to be licensed after a rules of the road/bike handling course in exchange for harsher penalties, or assumption of guilt, for drivers who hit cyclists.
I too am amazed at the habits of Urban Cyclists. But to lump all helmeted cyclist in with the behavior of a portion of a subset is irrational. I'm helmeted and I am very confident in my bike handling skills. I credit this to doing some single track mountain biking. I also get a lot of wave throughs at stop signs in my suburban travels up to the more exurban roads north of here. I think the cars are appreciative that I actuall stop and wait my turn. I think cars want you to be predictable, let them know when and where you are turning and not blow through lights/stops/yields when it is your responsibility to stop or yield.

The helmet debate has been discussed and I think the horse is dead. My bigger question, is how to reach the "kamikazee" cyclists and teach them to ride properly and how to reach the "kamikazee" motorist and teach them to drive more safely? Ironically, seems both are cut from the same cloth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2012, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Lake Arlington Heights, IL
5,479 posts, read 12,261,841 times
Reputation: 2848
Quote:
Originally Posted by thunderkat59 View Post


x10

Bicycle culture in America is different than in educated and civilized countries.

I agree with everything you say here, 100%.

There are two ways to use your head when you ride ~ The "serious" NASCAR bike-training ride/Poweranger arrogantocracy are generally going to be the past and future "saved by my helmet" advocates
OK, I'll "take the bait". What "educated and civilized" countries are you specifically referring to?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2012, 10:52 AM
 
Location: Richardson, TX
8,734 posts, read 13,817,220 times
Reputation: 3808
Quote:
Originally Posted by cubssoxfan View Post
OK, I'll "take the bait". What "educated and civilized" countries are you specifically referring to?
When you have trouble making a point, the best thing to do is to employ a quick dash of prejudicial rhetoric. How can anyone argue against that point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2012, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
102 posts, read 180,977 times
Reputation: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by cubssoxfan View Post
OK, I'll "take the bait". What "educated and civilized" countries are you specifically referring to?
I'll take Denmark and The Netherlands for $500, Alex.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2012, 11:22 AM
 
3,463 posts, read 5,659,395 times
Reputation: 7218
ITs amazing some bike advocates can be so informationally challenged. Simply put-- the same ideology that determines car drivers in the USA dont require helmets, determines bike riders in educated and forward thinking countries don't require them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2012, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
2,894 posts, read 5,905,987 times
Reputation: 2186
Quote:
Originally Posted by thunderkat59 View Post
ITs amazing some bike advocates can be so informationally challenged. Simply put-- the same ideology that determines car drivers in the USA dont require helmets, determines bike riders in educated and forward thinking countries don't require them.
The big difference is that those countries have the cycling culture embedded in the fabric of society. For them cycling is a mundane activity that almost everyone engages in.
In the states this isn't the case. The US is a car-centric country.
In that aspect we are decades behind these highly evolved societies, but I do see a turning trend. Gridlocks, mass transportation shut downs (recently here in NYC), soaring gas prices, and the rise of health-conscious people will make cycling more attractive than ever in the US.
One day we'll be as evolved as those northern European countries. I'm very hopeful about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2012, 12:52 PM
 
Location: San Diego
5,319 posts, read 8,983,727 times
Reputation: 3396
Quote:
Originally Posted by thunderkat59 View Post
ITs amazing some bike advocates can be so informationally challenged. Simply put-- the same ideology that determines car drivers in the USA dont require helmets, determines bike riders in educated and forward thinking countries don't require them.
I've said this before ... and I will say it again.

In Dutch countries such as The Netherlands ... the driver of a car is assumed to be at fault when colliding with a bike.

It's the way their law is written.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycling_in_the_Netherlands

Quote:
"Strict liability", supported in law in the Netherlands,[2] leads to driver's insurance being deemed to be responsible in a collision between a car and a cyclist. Dutch drivers are trained for the interaction with cyclists, for example by checking and re-checking their right-hand side before making a turn to the right.
So in Dutch countries, drivers are a lot more cautious around bicyclists, because drivers don't want to be held liable for causing an accident.

Bicyclists in Dutch countries are not as concerned about getting into accidents with cars, since they know drivers are constantly looking out for them.

Unfortunately, our law doesn't work that way here in the U.S., so helmet use is more important here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2012, 01:37 PM
 
Location: Lake Arlington Heights, IL
5,479 posts, read 12,261,841 times
Reputation: 2848
Quote:
Originally Posted by thunderkat59 View Post
ITs amazing some bike advocates can be so informationally challenged. Simply put-- the same ideology that determines car drivers in the USA dont require helmets, determines bike riders in educated and forward thinking countries don't require them.
Helmets in vehicle compared to helmets on a bicycle is like comparing an apple to an aardvark
There are a much larger # of cyclists in the "educated and forward looking countries". Critical mass makes for a safer cycling environment. Many motorists are also cyclists, so they are not driving like asshats endangering cyclists. Liability laws are different. The "roadies" I saw in France last year wear helmets also.
Your logic that it's stupid to wear a helmet while cycling is very illogical. The helmet does not impede my ability to cycle safely. It is relatively inexpensive. While it does NOT provide an injury prevention guarantee, it certainly can help reduce or prevent head injuries if one falls and hits their head.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2012, 01:46 PM
 
3,463 posts, read 5,659,395 times
Reputation: 7218
Quote:
Originally Posted by cubssoxfan View Post
Your logic that it's stupid to wear a helmet while cycling is very illogical. The helmet does not impede my ability to cycle safely. It is relatively inexpensive. While it does NOT provide an injury prevention guarantee, it certainly can help reduce or prevent head injuries if one falls and hits their head.
To continue this conversation with me, can you provide me with a post where I said wearing a helmet was "stupid"? Your interpretation of my posts is so far off Im not even sure if you are responding to the correct individual.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Hobbies and Recreation > Cycling
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top