Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-08-2018, 08:25 AM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,350,015 times
Reputation: 21891

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MDrenter223 View Post
I’m looking at moving to an area where the median household income is only $60k/yr, but the median three bedroom home is $600k.

How does that even work?

My household income will finally be more than sustenance level, but even grossing more than 3x the median I can’t afford a freaking $600,000 home (well not without a down payment and sticking to the rule of 28).

This is a crazy world we live in.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aslowdodge View Post
So the op wants a 600k mortgage on a 600k house?
It just seems like if they have 11k a month the mortgage should not be that hard if putting down 20 percent.
It seems as if the OP is moving to a new job and will finally have that large income. That does not mean that the op had that large income all along.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-08-2018, 09:15 AM
 
1,198 posts, read 1,792,634 times
Reputation: 1728
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Zero View Post
If it's California, prop 13 would contribute to a huge disconnect between median income and home price.
Looked up prop 13, that is a really interesting piece of legislation.

Only the new residents are paying property taxes on the full value of their home. Is that why you hear of high home values in places like LA, but the schools are also fairly awful?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2018, 09:20 AM
 
Location: Saint John, IN
11,582 posts, read 6,738,871 times
Reputation: 14786
I know someone who owned a home in California and when he relocated for work to the Chicagoland area he was able to pay cash for his home in a VERY affluent Chicago suburb. Now don't get me wrong, Chicago is extremely high for COL too, but compared to California it's much less.


My point is, OP if you are looking to buy a home in the future, but don't feel you can afford your area then it's time to move to where you can afford it!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2018, 09:21 AM
 
Location: NY/LA
4,663 posts, read 4,550,488 times
Reputation: 4140
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDrenter223 View Post
Looked up prop 13, that is a really interesting piece of legislation.

Only the new residents are paying property taxes on the full value of their home. Is that why you hear of high home values in places like LA, but the schools are also fairly awful?
I don't know about that, but I would imagine that lower property taxes are one of the reasons why state income tax is so high. (Our annual property tax is about .6%-.7% of the FMV of our house, and we only bought a little over 5 years ago.)

You have more stability and predictability once you own a home, but there are trade-offs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2018, 09:58 AM
 
Location: The Triad
34,090 posts, read 82,988,469 times
Reputation: 43666
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDrenter223 View Post
Only the new residents are paying property taxes on the (current) full value of their home.
Ten years later their tax will still be based on the value today.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CGab View Post
...don't feel you can afford your area then it's time to move to where you can afford it!!
This is just as true for doctors as it is for burger flippers
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2018, 10:11 AM
 
Location: Was Midvalley Oregon; Now Eastside Seattle area
13,075 posts, read 7,515,583 times
Reputation: 9798
Quote:
Originally Posted by American Expat View Post
No, Seattle hasn't adopted any measures to stop or slow foreign buying as far as I'm aware. It's a dilemma because those buyers are bringing cash that is helping sellers and the economy overall but making it very difficult for people working in the local economy to buy a desirable house To be fair, Seattle hasn't had yet nearly the foreign buying that Vancouver saw at its peak.
We are not all foreigners
We bought our first Seattle rental from inheritance money, 2015. The seller had already dropped his Ask twice, priced too high. Selling into the Winter months and wanted to move back home in Utah. He also was going to make a 20% profit on his 14 months of ownership plus rent collection.
We are ROI positive on this unit and +50% market appreciation in our 30 months of ownership. Our rent will increase $50 (2%) on the next cycle to previous owner's level. Rent is slightly below market, slightly behind on fixed expenses (HOA, Ins, taxes).

A couple-3 years ago, Seattle area, It was more advantageous to buy than to rent. The situation is turning where renting will be cheaper than buying, primarily because of the shortage of condos, SFH and Townhouses within commuting distance. Rentals availability will be coming on strong in 2018. JMO.

Last edited by leastprime; 02-08-2018 at 10:27 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2018, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Formerly Pleasanton Ca, now in Marietta Ga
10,351 posts, read 8,572,211 times
Reputation: 16698
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOON2BNSURPRISE View Post
It seems as if the OP is moving to a new job and will finally have that large income. That does not mean that the op had that large income all along.
Agreed, I posted that and the op came back and confirmed it. It does sound like he does not live in California now, but has a job there coming soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2018, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Formerly Pleasanton Ca, now in Marietta Ga
10,351 posts, read 8,572,211 times
Reputation: 16698
Quote:
Originally Posted by CGab View Post
I know someone who owned a home in California and when he relocated for work to the Chicagoland area he was able to pay cash for his home in a VERY affluent Chicago suburb. Now don't get me wrong, Chicago is extremely high for COL too, but compared to California it's much less.


My point is, OP if you are looking to buy a home in the future, but don't feel you can afford your area then it's time to move to where you can afford it!!
Yep. If you live in coastal California or the metro areas and have equity you are in pretty good shape to live elsewhere. I just bought a home and a similar home back in the Bay Area would by 4x the monthly payment plus I would need another 250k for the down payment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2018, 06:34 PM
 
Location: Sydney Australia
2,301 posts, read 1,522,955 times
Reputation: 4833
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
I don't get the past tense with Vancouver. My sister's house on West 19th in Dunbar went up another $500K last year. There is no sign of a slowdown. She's paying city property taxes on over $3 million valuation. People are being chased out of their homes by the property taxes. All that does is accelerate the teardowns to construct new homes with a 2nd wok kitchen that sit unoccupied.
I had read, perhaps incorrectly, that Vancouver had introduced penalties on properties that are unoccupied and that this had caused a turn down in sales to overseas investors.

Out of curiosity, how much are typical property taxes there? Ours do not increase greatly if the house is owner occupied. You pay more on purchase on all properties and again more capital gains tax on sale for an investment property. But annual rates, as we call them, might be $1400 a year on a cheap house and $2500 on one four times the value.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2018, 07:17 PM
 
Location: In the Redwoods
30,357 posts, read 51,950,786 times
Reputation: 23786
Welcome to California, I guess?

I live in the Bay Area, where median home prices are well over $900K in most neighborhoods - and median household income averages like $85-140K depending on the city. But as someone pointed out earlier, you have to consider that not everyone is buying homes. In fact, we probably have way more renters than your average cities, including families and not-young professionals. I'm a 41 year-old woman, single with no children, income around $84K; and I've never owned a home. I rent instead, and currently have a "good deal" at $2100/mo for a 1br duplex. We make compromises to live in these expensive regions, usually because this is where the good jobs are too. And in my case, I grew up and still have family/friends here.

As for the (not filthy rich) homebuyers here, they're either "house poor" and/or have a sizable down payment. A lot of folks (of all ages) get this money from parents/family, since it's tough to save $100K+ on your own, even with a comfortable salary. If I ever do buy a home around here, that's the deal I have - my father has that much put aside for me, otherwise I'd NEVER even have a chance at home ownership. The mortgage + tax payments would still be out of my reach, though, which is why I haven't taken him up on the offer yet. Not to mention, I'm hoping to relocate somewhere more affordable soon.

Last edited by gizmo980; 02-08-2018 at 07:27 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top