Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-05-2010, 01:32 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 45,016,441 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

Turn out will be the key and by all measures, the democrat voters are not too enthused with voting.

Dreadful results in Middle America for the Obama Democrats | Washington Examiner (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/dreadful-results-in-middle-america-for-the-obama-democrats-99953539.html - broken link)

Quote:
The big news is that in both states nearly twice as many voters chose to participate in the Republican primary as in the Democratic primary. The numbers are as follows:

Another way to look at it: Republicans won 66% of the two-party vote in Michigan and 65% of the two-party vote in Missouri.
Look at the lovely numbers in the link.

If this holds for November, it is good news indeed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-05-2010, 01:52 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,217 posts, read 19,518,798 times
Reputation: 5313
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Turn out will be the key and by all measures, the democrat voters are not too enthused with voting.

Dreadful results in Middle America for the Obama Democrats | Washington Examiner (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/dreadful-results-in-middle-america-for-the-obama-democrats-99953539.html - broken link)



Look at the lovely numbers in the link.

If this holds for November, it is good news indeed.
Doesn't mean much. Primary turnout is often determined by how competitive the Primary races are. In both Missouri and Michigan the GOP had more competitive races than the Democrats did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 05:04 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 45,016,441 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
Doesn't mean much. Primary turnout is often determined by how competitive the Primary races are. In both Missouri and Michigan the GOP had more competitive races than the Democrats did.
I think not.

Both had competitive primary races.

Quote:
In both states both parties had relatively congruent top-ticket races. Both had seriously contested governor races in Michigan and both had lopsided primaries with clear favorites for U.S. senator in Missouri.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 05:16 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,217 posts, read 19,518,798 times
Reputation: 5313
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
I think not.

Both had competitive primary races.

The GOP Governor's Primary was MUCH more competitive than the Democratic one. Also while Blunt & Carnahan were clear favorites in their Primaries, Carnahan's Primary was even more of a cake walk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 45,016,441 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
The GOP Governor's Primary was MUCH more competitive than the Democratic one. Also while Blunt & Carnahan were clear favorites in their Primaries, Carnahan's Primary was even more of a cake walk.
I think I'll stick with this analysis, from the professionals.

RealClearPolitics - Enthusiasm Gap on Display in Tuesday's Primaries

Michigan; Ratio almost 2-1

Quote:
Both parties had competitive races on Tuesday, and once again the ratio of Republicans to Democrats at the polls was the highest of the decade. In fact, it was nearly double the second-highest ratio all decade. Turnout was almost double that in the 2008 GOP Presidential primary, while Democratic turnout was once again at its lowest point all decade.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 06:03 PM
 
Location: Michigan
5,376 posts, read 5,355,286 times
Reputation: 1633
All eyes in Michigan were on the GOP.

4 career politicians, Oakland County Sheriff Mike Bouchard, State Attorney General Mike Cox, U.S. Rep. Pete Hoekstra and state Sen. Tom George were beat out by Rick Snyder, the most moderate Repulbican since our last good governor, William Millikan, who was governor from 1969-83.

It was a great day, as the Right to Life supported and endorsed candidate, lost.

Snyder won by talking jobs, not Obama or abortion, two topics a couple of the other candidates made their rally cry.

“The number one issue by far is more and better jobs, “ Snyder told reporters at a Wednesday GOP luncheon. “This is about Michiganders solving problems, not about fighting all the time. ... We have a broken culture with this win-lose attitude we have today.”

I voted for him (just like I did for Millikan in the past), and will do the same in the November election.

One of the things you have to remember, is in the Michigan primary, you can only vote for people of one party, and the only party choices are (R) or (D).

Last edited by plannine; 08-05-2010 at 06:14 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 07:33 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,959,929 times
Reputation: 49249
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
I think not.

Both had competitive primary races.
I agree,

Smash is losing his objectivity in the past few months. His opinions are a little to slanted..

He used to be able to see more than one side. He does know a lot about politics even if the lists of who is and isn't running is getting a little technical.

Come Nov, we will know how close to right he is.


Nita
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 07:42 PM
 
3,504 posts, read 3,932,190 times
Reputation: 1357
nobody cares about primaries.

even with the high gop turnout, how much of the total district even bothered to vote? i bet its under 40 percent
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 07:55 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 45,016,441 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
One of the things you have to remember, is in the Michigan primary, you can only vote for people of one party, and the only party choices are (R) or (D).
How many chose an R ballot?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2010, 08:05 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,714,513 times
Reputation: 7943
Big deal. All that matters is who wins the general election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top