Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If he is physically in SC already, how is leaving a few hours earlier going to make a difference with that? That can't be the reason. He's just chicken.
You have got to be kidding. The situation here in Austin is the worst wildfire situation ever to hit Texas. I'm going to assume you simply don't understand that.
But again, you exemplify the reason Ron Paul can never win. You want to know why no one takes your candidate seriously, look in a mirror.
Ron Paul supporters are just so wacko, there is no way anyone would let people like that get anywhere near the White House. Rightfully so.
If he is physically in SC already, how is leaving a few hours earlier going to make a difference with that? That can't be the reason. He's just chicken.
I would support Paul before Perry but I still don't understand why you think it makes Paul look better by belittling a contender. It is much more effective to point out Paul's good qualities in a meaningful way.
It is just childish to say everyone else is wrong so I must be right.
You have got to be kidding. The situation here in Austin is the worst wildfire situation ever to hit Texas. I'm going to assume you simply don't understand that.
But again, you exemplify the reason Ron Paul can never win. You want to know why no one takes your candidate seriously, look in a mirror.
Ron Paul supporters are just so wacko, there is no way anyone would let people like that get anywhere near the White House. Rightfully so.
Yet they don't personally attack supporters of other candidates...
LOL! They are criticizing him for campaigning and not taking care of Texas and now they are criticizing him because he pulled out of the debate to take care of Texas.
He is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. LOL!
and if you have friends and family in the path of the fires you would be proud of his decision. Anyone who thinks he doesn't know he would get blasted for not being at the forum or whatever they are calling him needs their head examined.
My understanding and yours too obviously is, a governors first responsibility is to the state he leads.
LOL! They are criticizing him for campaigning and not taking care of Texas and now they are criticizing him because he pulled out of the debate to take care of Texas.
He is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. LOL!
A lesson learned from the right-wingers' toolbox.
One could argue it's about the wildfires, but one could also argue that he isn't prepared for a debate. If you like him, it's option one and if you don't, it's option two. Or any number of other possibilities. In any case, when the anointed frontrunner opts out, it's suspicious.
(You know, I had to really dig into the news for this wildfire story).
One could argue it's about the wildfires, but one could also argue that he isn't prepared for a debate. If you like him, it's option one and if you don't, it's option two. Or any number of other possibilities. In any case, when the anointed frontrunner opts out, it's suspicious.
(You know, I had to really dig into the news for this wildfire story).
So does anyone still want to call Perry returning to Texas some kind of political move?
yes, because i dont trust politicians and know they are always doing the political thing.
perry could care less about this fire, you, me or anybody else.
he got out of the debate because he wasnt ready to debate and a key tea party guy in SC just backed romney.
i would say its naive to think this wasnt a political move.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.