Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-11-2011, 12:04 AM
 
1,027 posts, read 1,257,449 times
Reputation: 892

Advertisements

Cain-mentum!

And also, something very interesting from Gallup:

"The eventual nominee was the runaway leader by this point in the campaign. In October 1999, George W. Bush led the Republican field with 60%, Bob Dole led in 1995 with 46%, George H.W. Bush in 1987 with 41%, Ronald Reagan in 1979 with 41%... and so on back to Richard Nixon in 1959, when he led with 67%."

Cain Surges, Nearly Ties Romney for Lead in GOP Preferences

Romney has some real problems if he can never break over 25% in any national poll.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-11-2011, 12:20 AM
 
Location: Springfield, Ohio
14,683 posts, read 14,662,025 times
Reputation: 15421
It just goes to show none of them are particularly well-liked or will present any real threat to Obama's reelection chances.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2011, 05:05 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,797,202 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natural510 View Post
It just goes to show none of them are particularly well-liked or will present any real threat to Obama's reelection chances.
and why do you say that?

Nita
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2011, 07:39 AM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,068,868 times
Reputation: 3884
A possibility. But, it could just as easily signal 'real' debate within the Republican Party, thus no consensus at this juncture.

To be honest, I'm not sure if it is best for a party to be Lemming-like - we all know what happens to the Lemmings - behind their candidate. Or to be fractuous in debate about a number of potential candidates.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natural510 View Post
It just goes to show none of them are particularly well-liked or will present any real threat to Obama's reelection chances.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2011, 07:49 AM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,709,355 times
Reputation: 9980
How can any of them win if they can't even get the majority of Republicans?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2011, 07:51 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,036,241 times
Reputation: 62204
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFix View Post
Romney has some real problems if he can never break over 25% in any national poll.
If you think about it, if all of the other candidates, except for the "unique Ron Paul voters" dropped out of the race except one of them, only Huntsman's (2%) voters would probably go to Romney, meaning the other remaining candidate would win. This is why Romney doesn't want any of them (except maybe Huntsman) to leave the race for as long as possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2011, 07:53 AM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,068,868 times
Reputation: 3884
Funny things happen in families. Families may fight like cats and dogs, but let someone, or something outside of family threaten one of them, and they form ranks in a heartbeat. Maybe that will the case here, maybe not. Only the smug think they know the future.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boompa View Post
How can any of them win if they can't even get the majority of Republicans?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2011, 07:56 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn
40,050 posts, read 34,616,724 times
Reputation: 10617
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFix View Post
Romney has some real problems if he can never break over 25% in any national poll.
Not news. Romney had similar problems the last time he thought he was going to become President. Nothing has changed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2011, 07:58 AM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,068,868 times
Reputation: 3884
good point
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2011, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,709,355 times
Reputation: 9980
You have to figure that when Ron Paul doesn't get the nomination much of his support will vote libertarian
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top