Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-07-2012, 08:48 PM
 
Location: Rational World Park
4,991 posts, read 4,505,887 times
Reputation: 2375

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
I don't believe them, that's my point. Dems say t hey love moderates until it comes time to vote for them, then there is some excuse.
A moderate democrat currently occupies the White House.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-07-2012, 08:49 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,755,547 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
Santorum a better choice? You're joking right?

Better? Do you mean make a better President, than Romney? Probably not. more electable, maybe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2012, 08:50 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,755,547 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frozenyo View Post
A moderate democrat currently occupies the White House.

Only hardcore lefties believe this, and they are irrelevent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2012, 08:51 PM
 
Location: St. Joseph Area
6,233 posts, read 9,482,428 times
Reputation: 3133
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
No, the independents elected the Tea Party in the last election cycle, they can hardly be described as moderates.
And many of those same ones elected Obama in '08. In '08, independents were sick of the Bush administration and other issues and thought Obama would do a better job. Then in 2010, they weren't happy with Obama, so they voted in the Republicans (led by the tea party) Independents may lean left or right, but they still evaluate issues critically instead of blind allegiance to party, so I'd say based on that that they're more moderate than the partisans in either party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2012, 08:51 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,755,547 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
In the 21st century, moderates will win the vast majority of elections. Reagan ran a far less conservative campaign and governed in a less conservative way than clouded memories here portray him to have done. 5 revenue enhancement acts, Reagan speak to conceal tax hikes. A deal with PATCO giving them raises was met with his approval; the union went for more, and violated terms which led to their demise.

You must be very young. Reagan was viewed, at the time, to the right of Atilla the Hun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2012, 08:53 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,755,547 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by mackinac81 View Post
And many of those same ones elected Obama in '08. In '08, independents were sick of the Bush administration and other issues and thought Obama would do a better job. Then in 2010, they weren't happy with Obama, so they voted in the Republicans (led by the tea party) Independents may lean left or right, but they still evaluate issues critically instead of blind allegiance to party.

Maybe, but they clearly weren't looking for moderates. Both Obama and the Tea Party were (are) at the extremes of the parties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2012, 08:55 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
I don't believe them, that's my point. Dems say t hey love moderates until it comes time to vote for them, then there is some excuse.
I think it really depends on who the opponent is. This election, a far right candidate will get his butt kicked, but a moderate will probably beat Obama. Other elections with a successful Democratic candidate, say Clinton, a candidate more right wing would have a better chance.

Remember, Obama won the popular vote by a very small percentage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2012, 08:55 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,972,963 times
Reputation: 7315
True, Smash255. The big mistake folks make comparing RR and JM is this. RR was running vs a presidnet viewed (right or wrong) as a failure, high unemployment, inflation,low morale. JM ran following a two termer leaving as a massive failure, with the nation having lost over 1 million jobs in the 2 months right before the election. JM deserved kudos for not losing by double digits.

Years ago, I heard a great story about 62 Mets and Manager Stengel. 3rd baseman made 3 errors one day; next day he starts a ne wone, a defensive whiz, who makes his first 2 in a long time. Casey says "The first guy screwed it up so bad, no one can play it". In Nov, 2008 the first one was Gdeorge Bush. GB had ruined the party brand, every bit as much as Carter did the Dems in the late 70s.

And you want to crucify JM for not being able to win..absurd.

By early October, I knew the presidency had been decided. The contest was Hillary vs Obama. November was a formality, thanks to the mess Bush had left.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2012, 08:57 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,466,581 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
I think it really depends on who the opponent is. This election, a far right candidate will get his butt kicked, but a moderate will probably beat Obama. Other elections with a successful Democratic candidate, say Clinton, a candidate more right wing would have a better chance.

Remember, Obama won the popular vote by a very small percentage.
Obama won the popular vote by 7.26%, that isn't exactly a "very small percentage"....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2012, 08:57 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,972,963 times
Reputation: 7315
shorebaby, Reagan played a moderate game campaigning. "Shining City on the Hill" spoken by Obama would come across as 60s-ish Touchy Feely Liberalism.

The whole campaign was feel good stuff. Not the coarse, hateful "Let em die" rants we have heard at the 2012 debates.

Reagan would have taken the Tea Party to the woodshed, and he had the popularity to do it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top