2007 Article that Mitt Romney Does Not Want You to Read (voters, Iran)

[Kerby W-R]

The article is about Romney criticizing Obama for vowing to strike al Qaeda targets inside Pakistan if necessary.

Romney attacks Obama over Pakistan warning | Reuters

[summers73]

Don't worry, he'll have a come to Jesus (or whatever entity his cult worships) moment if he becomes the nominee. That "dance towards the center" during the general will have him being a true believer in Pakistani non-intervention (assuming of course, he can leverage it for moderate votes).

[AONE]

So basically he would waste time in a fight he wouldn't be committed to. hmmm doesn't sound like the way to get ahead.

Guess that means he objects to killing bin laden... Some threads seem to want to portray him as tough... doesn't sound so tough to me.

I don't know that I like all the aspects of our war but Obama has been committed to seeing it through and he has made some hard decisions which were effective. Love him or hate him you can't say he didn't do something with th e war.

[summers73]

Originally Posted by AONE

Love him or hate him you can't say he didn't do something with th e war.

Translation: "He's a good progressive neo-con, just not my kind of progressive neo-con"

[Kerby W-R]

How can anyone believe what he says, when he doesn't even believe what he says !

[lifelongMOgal]

Considering Romney is clearly pro-war when it comes to Iran this is consistent this flip-flop should be no suprise.

Romney was:

for abortion before he was against it

for gun control before he suddenly became against it (last night's debate)

against bombings before he was for them...........

I geuss GOP voters would rather have a flip-flopping liar than an honest man who walks the walk. Good hair, slick talk, and a lot of $$ buys the Oval Office.