Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Q. The only difference between Obama, Mitt and Newt is.
A. Obama promotes big government solutions with a telepromter. Mitt and Newt promote each others records for big government straight from their hearts.
Q. The only difference between Obama, Mitt and Newt is.
A. Obama promotes big government solutions with a telepromter. Mitt and Newt promote each others records for big government straight from their hearts.
The solution to this problem can be found below!
Ron Paul 2012
I see you werent attempting to be serious because any of these 3, have a far greater chance at being the next President, over Ron Paul
That being said, the difference is clear, they all have vastly different experiences behind them. We are just choosing what history is most impotant.
I see you werent attempting to be serious because any of these 3, have a far greater chance at being the next President, over Ron Paul
That being said, the difference is clear, they all have vastly different experiences behind them. We are just choosing what history is most impotant.
Why be serious if these are the so called choices American's have.
I guess if you want big government that has a R or D next to the name then sure you have 3 choices.
3 bad choices!
You know Mao, Stalin and Hilter all have very difference experiences behind them none of which makes a difference when your dealing with the idea that government knows best.
The real difference is Obama has won a Presidential Election, Newt and Mitt are at this point just wannabes..........................................
That is true Obama is good at big government promises.. Newt and Mitt only aspire and hope that with change someday to do the same.
Maybe Mittens and Newt should just join Obama's staff if he is re-elected.
Maybe Newt can promote government housing with lobby money, Mitt can give us Romney/Obama Care and Obama will sell it to the media.
The only thing I WANNABE is free of the people like this running our country.
Why be serious if these are the so called choices American's have.
I guess if you want big government that has a R or D next to the name then sure you have 3 choices.
3 bad choices!
You know Mao, Stalin and Hilter all have very difference experiences behind them none of which makes a difference when your dealing with the idea that government knows best.
You lose all credibility by comparing any of the current candidates to those 3 individuals, and I'm about as far anti government you can get.
Recognizing people who lie a lot, has nothing to do with Partisanship. Pretty much all politicians lie, some more than others and a few very little. I appreciate those that I find who lie very little.
Recognizing people who lie a lot, has nothing to do with Partisanship. Pretty much all politicians lie, some more than others and a few very little. I appreciate those that I find who lie very little.
But yet you didnt mention Obama when discussing liers. Must be because Obama is an upstanding citizen who's never lied. Shall we recap the state of the union address? haha.. thanks for bringing back your humor...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
