Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-04-2012, 08:26 AM
 
Location: Riverside
4,088 posts, read 4,387,641 times
Reputation: 3092

Advertisements

In the debate, Romney astounded Obama and millions of Americans by insisting that his post-Obamacare plan will still provide coverage for people with Pre-existing conditions.

It WILL NOT, of course, but that fact did not slow down Romney for a second last night. It was left to his manager, Eric Fernstrom, to explain to a dubious press after the debate that, OF COURSE people with Pre-existing conditions will be covered by Romney's plan. All that has to happen is, ALL FIFTY STATES WILL HAVE TO INDIVIDUALLY PASS THEIR OWN VERSIONS OF OBAMACARE:

Romney Adviser Gives Up The Ghost On Pre-existing Conditions | TPMDC

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-04-2012, 08:40 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,450,045 times
Reputation: 4243
That is not what he said. He said it will be up to the states to do what they feel is right and would like to see them not discriminate against the sick. This thread is YOUR big lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2012, 08:58 AM
 
748 posts, read 1,375,869 times
Reputation: 954
It will only cover preexisting conditions IF they have had previous coverage without a lapse...we have that same stipulation in place now. Romney was not clear about how much of a lapse..that could be 1 day! He had no clear answers..about a lot of things!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2012, 08:59 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
I find it funny that Obama is attacking Romney for wanting to give seniors a "voucher", because insurance industries will pick the healthiest members. Didnt anyone tell Obama that obamacare doesnt allow that taking place?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2012, 09:02 AM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,414,577 times
Reputation: 6462
Pre existing conditions have been covered by law since Clinton. Of course you have had to have insurance previously but it covers most situations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2012, 09:12 AM
 
Location: Riverside
4,088 posts, read 4,387,641 times
Reputation: 3092
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardA View Post
Pre existing conditions have been covered by law since Clinton. Of course you have had to have insurance previously but it covers most situations.
It didn't cover my son's "situation". After he timed-out on our family policy, he was on his own. Due to Pre-existing conditions, he could not get coverage, till Obamacare passed. Now, he has full coverage. But if Romney succeeds in repealing Obamacare, he'll be back where he started.

I gotta think my son's case is not unique.

Romney's "plan"- "let very state do what it can", will result in 72 million Americans being without insurance:

72 Million Will Go Without Health Insurance Under Romney's Health Plan | ThinkProgress
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2012, 09:14 AM
 
Location: State of Being
35,879 posts, read 77,491,785 times
Reputation: 22752
People: insurance reform is NOT healthcare reform!

Any state could have already insisted that the insurance companies allowed to do business in that state also recognize pre=existing conditions!

Plus, Romney said he would make sure that this was a mandate.

So you are simply incorrect on this one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2012, 09:15 AM
 
Location: Riverside
4,088 posts, read 4,387,641 times
Reputation: 3092
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
That is not what he said. He said it will be up to the states to do what they feel is right and would like to see them not discriminate against the sick. This thread is YOUR big lie.
"I would like to see them not discriminate" is not a PLAN. It is wishful thinking.

Do you suck on lemons all day?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2012, 09:22 AM
 
Location: Riverside
4,088 posts, read 4,387,641 times
Reputation: 3092
Quote:
Originally Posted by anifani821 View Post
People: insurance reform is NOT healthcare reform!

Any state could have already insisted that the insurance companies allowed to do business in that state also recognize pre=existing conditions!

Plus, Romney said he would make sure that this was a mandate.

So you are simply incorrect on this one.
Romney will MANDATE that states cover Pre-existing conditions Do you have a link for that???

I HAVE heard Romney say, that persons PREVIOUSLY INSURED would still be covered, but that's NOT the same thing as saying ALL people with Pre-existing conditions can find coverage. That was one of the main reasons we needed Obamacare in the first place. Everybody buys in, so insurance companies can AFFORD to cover PEC cases.

Romney likes to play bait-and-switch with this. He'll say he favors coverage for PEC in an interview, then leave it to his staff to come in the next day and explain he didn't mean it. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE WAKE OF THE DEBATE.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2012, 09:39 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,450,045 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurbie View Post

Romney's "plan"- "let very state do what it can", will result in 72 million Americans being without insurance:

72 Million Will Go Without Health Insurance Under Romney's Health Plan | ThinkProgress
How in the world can StinkProgress even come to this conclusion when NOBODY knows what the states will do?! They even have a number without knowing anything? Another big lie by you. I see this is going to be the MO for you guys now, just making **** up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top