Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Since you are having trouble with this, if they were 16 in 2010 this would be the first year they could vote. So yes there will be many young people voting for the first time.
Very good, glad you figured that out.........but again, read what I quoted.....he talked about 2008...not 2010....those that were 16 and 17 had the chance to vote in 2010...right?
Very good, glad you figured that out.........but again, read what I quoted.....he talked about 2008...not 2010....those that were 16 and 17 had the chance to vote in 2010...right?
I certainly was not talking about 2008. I already made that clear by copying and pasting exactly what I did say, only changing the bold to emphasize the year 2010... NOT 2008.
You seem desperate, and you seem scared, and you also don't live in the real world.
Wasn't Mitt now was it, who lied thru his teeth with his administration about 4 dead Americans, and lied continously for 2 weeks after.
Knowing within 2 hrs after the death of 4 americans, the real truth.
People don't like liars, people respect truth. People who are desperate, show they are desperate.
When you run scared, you try and convince yourself of your own reality, when in reality People know the real Obama, and that Hope n' Change never came.
More homeless, on welfare, and food stamps, more unemployed then ever, think these people are going to forget what they were promised, keep being scared, love it.
Maybe YOU should be the one to read things more carefully...
This is what I said...
"You think they ALL voted in 2010 in a mid-term election?
Even the ones who were 16 or 17 at the time?"
I did not say ANYTHING about 2008.
You said NOTHING about 2008? Then why did you mention it in your original post? I mean, come on...it was only a few minutes ago.....
What makes you think those kids that were not old enough in 2008 to vote were still to young to vote in 2010? You never put an age range....Unless you were talking about a 14-15 year old, that will now be able to vote this year....but the 16-17 year old very well could have voted in 2010....
Quote:
Originally Posted by BringTheContent
Oh yeah? And what about all of the new voters who will be going to the polls for the first time in November? The people who were too young to vote in 2008? Who do you suppose they are going to vote for... Romney? LOL, yeah, the kids love Romney! There are going to be plenty of new Obama voters. You don't hear anything about them because you are too busy burying your head in the sand.
I certainly was not talking about 2008. I already made that clear by copying and pasting exactly what I did say, only changing the bold to emphasize the year 2010... NOT 2008.
Fail look at the bottom of the front page R Money/Ryan hosting a victory rally WTF they have not wone jack sh** yet
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Thank you! Right on!
