Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
In this wild scenario the GOP would certainly make sure that happened. But returning to reality, the GOP has already done its utmost to keep Johnson off the ballot in whatever states it could:
"Now that Johnson is threatening to siphon votes from Mitt Romney in close elections in Colorado and Nevada (he’s also on the ballot in 46 other states and Washington, D.C.), Republicans are doing whatever they can to limit his appeal. Michigan party officials kept him off the ballot because he filed his paperwork three minutes late. In Pennsylvania, the GOP hired a private detective who went to canvassers’ homes and flashed his old FBI badge before questioning the signatures they collected, a lawyer for Johnson’s campaign alleged. The state GOP and the investigator denied doing anything improper. (On Oct. 10 a judge decided that Johnson will be on the Pennsylvania ballot.)"
In this wild scenario the GOP would certainly make sure that happened. But returning to reality, the GOP has already done its utmost to keep Johnson off the ballot in whatever states it could:
"Now that Johnson is threatening to siphon votes from Mitt Romney in close elections in Colorado and Nevada (he’s also on the ballot in 46 other states and Washington, D.C.), Republicans are doing whatever they can to limit his appeal. Michigan party officials kept him off the ballot because he filed his paperwork three minutes late. In Pennsylvania, the GOP hired a private detective who went to canvassers’ homes and flashed his old FBI badge before questioning the signatures they collected, a lawyer for Johnson’s campaign alleged. The state GOP and the investigator denied doing anything improper. (On Oct. 10 a judge decided that Johnson will be on the Pennsylvania ballot.)"
And its why they are on here saying a vote for Johnson is a vote for Obama. Its an insult to a humans intelligence.
That statement makes the ludicrous assumption that someone voting for Johnson would otherwise have voted for Romney. Certainly not a valid assumption in my case.
That statement makes the ludicrous assumption that someone voting for Johnson would otherwise have voted for Romney. Certainly not a valid assumption in my case.
I just don't see many Johnson voters leaning towards President Obama.
Besides - the libertarians want change - and voting for President Obama continues the same failed policies of the Democrat party that got us into this mess in the first place.
Will both the Obama and Romney campaigns sue to prevent his inaugaration?
He won't win and if heaven and hell collided and dogs developed the ability to speak English and he does win, no Romney and Obama will not sue.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Not a chance in hell
