Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If Hillary runs in 2016 she will sweep the election and likely bring many dems in office with her win. If the R's held either side of Congress in 2016, they would lose both. Everyone will be tired of the R's not doing their job.
R's are a lock in the House until 2022, barring a black swan event. Gerrymandering has seen to that quite nicely.
The logic is simple: Hillary Clinton is an opportunist. She badly wants to break the male-only Presidential "glass ceiling," but only if she can come away with a legacy to match it. Given Republicans abject Hatred of All Things Clinton,â„¢ I predict that Hillary Clinton will view a GOP Senate and House Majority a threat to her very ambition to actually get anything done as the first female President. The chances that Democrats retake one or both of the chambers in 2016 would be so slim, that a 2014 GOP steamroll would/will force her to retire politically instead of running for President in 2016.
No doubt about it, she's waiting on the 2014 midterms to make a decision.
What do you think?
R's have to play too much defense in the senate in 2016 in terms of the seats that are up- the balance of power will shift back due to the differing electorate that comes out in POTUS cycles.
she won't care what they results are in the 2014 midterms.
if she runs and if she wins, she'll have a D senate but R house.
Far more than the right... and that is undeniable, even with the typical cognitive dissonance.
It's funny watching you both banter back and forth about which is worse when you are talking about the exact same animal. It's like arguing the difference between a Mallard and a duck. Neither is better or worse than the other. They are both owned by Corporate entities and don't give a flyin fert for anyone other than ingratiating themselves.
The chances that Democrats retake one or both of the chambers in 2016 would be so slim, that a 2014 GOP steamroll would/will force her to retire politically instead of running for President in 2016.
I think you are wrong. Where are you getting your facts?
These next two years and what is coming down the pipeline, are going to expose the Progressive ideology for what it really is. Fraud and swindle. Obama has been using his pen & phone, to push back things that are going to drop on us all, as his term gets closer to an end.
An incredibly idiotic assumption. If the GOP wins the Senate by 1 seat the Dems are well positioned to win it back since they have the map in their favor. Rush must really be spouting his usual fecal matter and getting his loser listeners all riled up
These next two years and what is coming down the pipeline, are going to expose the Progressive ideology for what it really is. Fraud and swindle. Obama has been using his pen & phone, to push back things that are going to drop on us all, as his term gets closer to an end.
Meanwhile, back in the real world, the rest of us know the difference between paranoia and reality.
Don't bet on Obama being the decisive issue in 2016. Both parties are already moving away from continuing to run against a President who will be leaving office by then.
Where is that thread where we all predicted the net gain/loss in the 2016 US Senate? IIRC I predicted +6 for the GOP, and it looks like I was off by 33 percent.
She will run and even if not elected in general election the Clintons partially win their prize. Remember Clinton controlled the democratic committee that writes the platform candidates run under. In 2008 they loss committee control to progressive liberasl under Obama. If she gets nomination she replaces those people.They control the platform basically. Every democrat in the nation will be under that platform to support or they will not get funding from national committee.
Where is that thread where we all predicted the net gain/loss in the 2016 US Senate? IIRC I predicted +6 for the GOP, and it looks like I was off by 33 percent.
I predicted 9 seats picked up for the Republicans.
i disagree. if hillary runs, she is a transformational type of candidate that could be a tsunami and turn everything blue like obama did in 08.
gop has 22 spots up in 2016, dems only have 9, and the only one they may lose is bennett in colorado, reid will win if he runs again.
shes going to get the highest percent of woman vote in history and 70-80 percent of the minority vote.
she, like obama, does not need the white male vote.
Cliven Bundy could beat Reid in Nevada, today.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
