Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So, if the majority want to ban abortion in SC, it's just fine with you. What about the women, who live in your state, but find themselves in the minority?
You want to limit a woman's right to choose, RP is indeed your man. His views on abortion line up with such sterling characters as Pat Roberson or James Dobson.
This is not about Ron Paul. This is the start of of change.
If they wanted off-shore drilling then go right ahead, I rather we remove our dependence on oil from foreign countries. So if that means we have to drill our coastline, then go ahead. To me cheaper gas is better than expensive gas.
Also would it be legal to spill oil all over these areas?
I would think that would not be allowed.
They do it through negligence, over a quarter of a million gallons were spilled at Prudhoe Bay in 2006. The environmental track record of the oil industry is abysmal. The oil companies access, to sensitive areas, must be restricted.
Btw, did you also know RP would allow coal mining on federal lands?
If you don't care about the environment, vote for RP.
They do it through negligence, over a quarter of a million gallons were spilled at Prudhoe Bay in 2006. The environmental track record of the oil industry is abysmal. The oil companies access, to sensitive areas, must be restricted.
Btw, did you also know RP would allow coal mining on federal lands?
If you don't care about the environment, vote for RP.
As a native Floridian, I understand your concern for the enviornment. I'm just curious though, where were all you tree huggers when every inch of marshland was being plowed over to accommedate a housing demand that didn't exist? What did exist was big politics allowing it to happen to scratch thier supporters backs. Since Ron Paul doesn't have big company lobbyist backing him, that won't be a concern. As far as I know he is the only one who won't have any backs to scratch. Educate me, which candidate do you believe is going to save the enviornment? I liked your posts much better when you talked about your pug. At least you had first hand information on that subject.
Upton, what's wrong with coal mining? Next you'll start saying you don't support nuclear power either.
Coal mining, at the moment, is a necessary evil, but NOT on federal lands. Is nothing sacred anymore? Or are we to leave industry to rape the lands that should be passed on to our children?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
