Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-21-2015, 08:14 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
13,561 posts, read 10,356,919 times
Reputation: 8252

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DewDropInn View Post
Close. He won because Governor Gray Davis tripled the fees to license a car. CA is car-oriented. Sky-high fees had owners rebelling against Davis. Schwartznegger joined the bandwagon and campaigned on ONE platform: lowering the fees. Had Davis not raised license fees.... Arnold would never have been elected governor.
It's a bit more than that. Power outages (aided by those folks at Enron) didn't help him either.
And he was a pretty lousy politician - a bit aloof from the Legislature as well.

Of course, Arnold's repeal of the extra fees had fiscal consequences that hurt the state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-21-2015, 10:22 PM
 
4,582 posts, read 3,408,767 times
Reputation: 2605
AND, though it will take a very long time to make a difference, CA has peaked in it's EV count.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2015, 12:13 AM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,759,397 times
Reputation: 10006
Bernie Sanders is the only candidate who could deliver California to the Republicans.

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.Thomas View Post
California is stronghold yes but getting all these swing states is more difficult than winning California.
No, not even close. They are called "swing states" for a reason. They could all go to the GOP in a close election. The Republicans would only take California in a landslide victory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2015, 12:15 AM
 
Location: Phoenix
30,370 posts, read 19,162,886 times
Reputation: 26262
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.Thomas View Post
California is the single most important state for the election.

Whoever wins there is basically headed to the WH.

So which candidate has a good chance??

Trump, Jeb, Carson or others
Disagree with the concept that whoever wins Cali wins election as that has not been the case in several recent elections. No Republican is going to win Cali.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2015, 12:53 AM
 
13,711 posts, read 9,233,267 times
Reputation: 9845
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.Thomas View Post
Your path is harder.

California is stronghold yes but getting all these swing states is more difficult than winning California.

I'm also not sure about FL either.

A lot of demographic changes.

I still think Cali is the key.

Romney failed as you remember.

He he. Then the Republicans may as well throw in the towel now.....
.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2015, 07:12 AM
 
Location: Type 0.73 Kardashev
11,110 posts, read 9,814,649 times
Reputation: 40166
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.Thomas View Post
Your path is harder.
My path is not harder. Again, did George W. Bush ever come close to winning California? No - he lost it twice by double-digit margins. And yet he found a path to 270, twice.

Quote:
California is stronghold yes but getting all these swing states is more difficult than winning California.
You are making the mistake of thinking each state exists in isolation, but they don't. Consider that in 2004 (the GOP's strongest Presidential performance since 1988) Bush won by 2.4%, while in 2012 Romney lost by 3.9%. Which is to say, the GOP did 6.3% better in 2004 than in 2012. And if we look at all the states Obama carried by less than 6.3% in 2012, we have:
FL
OH
VA
CO
NH
IA

It is no coincidence that Bush carried four of these states (FL, OH, VA, IA) in 2004 - and enough to win the Electoral College. Meanwhile, he lost California by 10%. Do you understand that? During the best Presidential performance by a Republican candidate since the 1980s, that candidate lost California by double-digits - and California has only become more Democratic since then. All eight state constitutional offices are held by Democrats. Democrats hold large majorities in both houses of the state legislature, as well as the state's Congressional delegation.

The point is that if a Republican nominee can just break even in the popular vote, FL and OH almost certainly fall into the Republican column. That might not be enough, but another point or two in the popular vote stands a very good chance of adding CO, NH and IA to the column. And maybe more states. Enough to win the Electoral College.

That's how you build a path to 270.

Quote:
I'm also not sure about FL either.
What do you mean, you're not sure?

In 2012, the GOP nominee lost Florida by less than 1% of the popular vote, while losing California by more than 23% of the popular vote. What planet do you live in where FL isn't a vastly easier get for the GOP than California?

Quote:
A lot of demographic changes.

I still think Cali is the key.

Romney failed as you remember.
Yes, a lot of demographic changes in California have put it completely out of reach of the GOP. Demographic changes in Florida aren't helping Republicans, but it'll be a swing state for the foreseeable future.

Romney failed, yes - do you have a point? In your magical world where states exist in isolation of the national tide, he could have added California's 55 Electoral College votes to his tally - and he'd still have lost the election 277-261.

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.Thomas View Post
People think Florida is a cake??

Florida is on it's way to be another California.
No one thinks Florida is a cakewalk - but anyone who isn't utterly clueless understands that it is a competitive state that either party might carry, while California is completely out of reach.

If you have to stoop to beating a strawman (ie, claiming that people are asserting that FL will be easy for the GOP to win), then you're effectively conceding that you have nothing of substance to say.

Quote:
Originally Posted by armourereric View Post
AND, though it will take a very long time to make a difference, CA has peaked in it's EV count.
This is not so. California continues to grow faster than the nation as a whole - which is why it's one of the states expected to gain seats in the House (and thus in the Electoral College) when the 2020 reapportionment rolls around.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...on_growth_rate
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball » Updated 2020 Reapportionment Projections
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2015, 07:19 AM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,628,813 times
Reputation: 21097
^LOL! You make the mistake of taking election results of a cherry picked Democrat vs Republican election and then using it to predict the future. If you think you can accurately do this, then you should start gambling on the Irish based Patty Power. You could be insanely rich as they are already taking bets on the 2016 election.

If anything, what it going on now with the primaries should demonstrate this won't be a typical election. The Middle Class has abandoned the DNC, long term political hacks are leaving both parties, and people in general are sick of the status quo.

The 2014 election was a preview of what's to come. i.e A complete shakeup of the political landscape not seen since 1976/1980. How it ends up is anyone's guess at this point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2015, 07:57 AM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,462,661 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
^LOL! You make the mistake of taking election results of a cherry picked Democrat vs Republican election and then using it to predict the future. If you think you can accurately do this, then you should start gambling on the Irish based Patty Power. You could be insanely rich as they are already taking bets on the 2016 election.

If anything, what it going on now with the primaries should demonstrate this won't be a typical election. The Middle Class has abandoned the DNC, long term political hacks are leaving both parties, and people in general are sick of the status quo.

The 2014 election was a preview of what's to come. i.e A complete shakeup of the political landscape not seen since 1976/1980. How it ends up is anyone's guess at this point.

Midterm and Presidential elections are completely different. The same argument you are making about 2014 and the impact on the future was made following the 2010 elections, and we know what happened in 2012.

Getting back to the OP, the answer is pretty much no Republican can take California, and no the Republicans do not need to win California to win the nation. It will be states like VA and Florida that will determine the winner (and these are states the GOP basically MUST win in order to win the Presidency, Dens have paths to win without them, the GOP really doesn't)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2015, 11:16 AM
 
4,081 posts, read 3,605,588 times
Reputation: 1235
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Enlightenment View Post
Bernie Sanders is the only candidate who could deliver California to the Republicans.



No, not even close. They are called "swing states" for a reason. They could all go to the GOP in a close election. The Republicans would only take California in a landslide victory.
I don't even think Bernie could hand over California to a Republican. You would need to see some "red creep" beforehand to make that even a possibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2015, 11:25 AM
 
11,755 posts, read 7,117,231 times
Reputation: 8011
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
^LOL! You make the mistake of taking election results of a cherry picked Democrat vs Republican election and then using it to predict the future.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
The 2014 election was a preview of what's to come. i.e A complete shakeup of the political landscape not seen since 1976/1980. How it ends up is anyone's guess at this point.
"Do as I say, not as I do."

Mick
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top