Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
elections are about picking the lesser of the evils. The only candidate that had a head on his shoulders was censored by the media and dropped out of the race. Choosing the lesser of evils is a difficult task. Kucinich all the way!!!
Would this be anything like her vote for the war, which she meant was a vote against the war? Anyways, sorry to inform you that your trying to change topic again. Iraq isnt the topic of the thread, try, try hard to stay on topic.. Here, let me help.
"Bill Clinton, two reasons to vote for Hillary".
No where was "republican" or "iraq war" a topic of the thread, unless you want to bring up her vote for the war, as a reason to vote for her..
Okay, I see. It' s okay for you to go off-topic with "Waco and Syria bombings" but not okay for me to rebut with "Iraq" killings because that would be off-topic.
Anyway, I have made my point about the value of Bill Clinton as an advisor in the White House. You haven't said anything that would negate that.
Okay, I see. It' s okay for you to go off-topic with "Waco and Syria bombings" but not okay for me to rebut with "Iraq" killings because that would be off-topic.
Anyway, I have made my point about the value of Bill Clinton as an advisor in the White House. You haven't said anything that would negate that.
Actually remembering what Bill Clinton did, and resons to vote for Hillary is the topic, a topic that you actually created. Last I checked Waco and Syria are actions of the Clinton "team".
Iraq is not an action of the Clintons, other then her vote for the war.
Actually remembering what Bill Clinton did, and resons to vote for Hillary is the topic, a topic that you actually created. Last I checked Waco and Syria are actions of the Clinton "team".
Iraq is not an action of the Clintons, other then her vote for the war.
OK then, if Waco and Syria are all you got to discredit the Clintons, let's close this little back and forth because looks like you just ran out of ammunition. See ya.
OK then, if Waco and Syria are all you got to discredit the Clintons, let's close this little back and forth because looks like you just ran out of ammunition. See ya.
If only it was only Waco and Syria.. but the topic is, TWO reasons to vote for Hillary.. So I named two.. while you may think them killing people unprovoked twice is a valid reason to vote for them, I disagree. Rename the thread, 500 reasons to vote for the Clintons, and I'm sure people would just start to list 500 reasons..
pghquest, do you really thing anyone can come up with 500 reasons to vote Clinton? I could probably think of 500 reasons NOT to...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
