Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think that's true, technically speaking. Starting in 2020, a Microsoft Chatbot will start tweeting racist and misogynist messages at 4 a.m. and thereby obviating the need for POTUS Trump.
And here we go. Now all you need to qualify for POTUS is to be a woman. News flash, I'm a woman and I won't vote for Hillary especially based on her being a woman. Voting for Hillary because she is a woman is asinine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbmaise
At least a few percentage of women are biased to vote for another woman.
True, some men are bias too.
However, look at history:
In 1996 Bill Clinton raked in 11 percentage points more women than men, 54% of all women and 43% of all men voted for Clinton.
The only other president to get a higher women vote was Barack Obama with 56%.
Therefore, it is logical once the US elects its first female president:
A. It is more likely more female Presidents in the future;
B. The female vote as a block will be most important to both parties;
C. Obama will be the last male POTUS for a very long time.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.