Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Despite the spate of posts complaining about the clinton foundation... this thread is about alleged bribery by trump. A subtext portion of the thread is that he is alleged to have also illegally used the trump foundation to funnel the money to bondi. Whether or not there is any illegality involved with the clinton foundation has nothing to do with the alleged illegality of the trump foundation. But, you can't reason with those who insist on linking the two as a means to somehow absolve trump of wrongdoing.
I dont see anyone claiming the actions of Trump were acceptable. Not even the Trump, who admitted wrongdoing by taking responsibility for their actions and sending money to the IRS.
Despite the spate of posts complaining about the clinton foundation... this thread is about alleged bribery by trump. A subtext portion of the thread is that he is alleged to have also illegally used the trump foundation to funnel the money to bondi. Whether or not there is any illegality involved with the clinton foundation has nothing to do with the alleged illegality of the trump foundation. But, you can't reason with those who insist on linking the two as a means to somehow absolve trump of wrongdoing.
The Clinton Foundation is relevant because there is 100 times more evidence of wrongdoing, but you dems outright dismiss it.
If you can dismiss all the evidence against the Clinton Foundation, then surely one simple filing mistake by the Trump Foundation is a non-story.
Using your own standard, there is no there, there, and the thread is over.
I dont see anyone claiming the actions of Trump were acceptable. Not even the Trump, who admitted wrongdoing by taking responsibility for their actions and sending money to the IRS.
that was simply for illegally donating from a non-profit to a political cause. it doesn't address the allegation of bribery.
The Clinton Foundation is relevant because there is 100 times more evidence of wrongdoing, but you dems outright dismiss it.
If you can dismiss all the evidence against the Clinton Foundation, then surely one simple filing mistake by the Trump Foundation is a non-story.
Using your own standard, there is no there, there, and the thread is over.
Again, this isn't about a "filing mistake", this is about committing bribery. A specific case of bribery, by trump and bondi. So, yeah, there is indeed a there, there.
Again, this isn't about a "filing mistake", this is about committing bribery. A specific case of bribery, by trump and bondi. So, yeah, there is indeed a there, there.
You claiming there is a there, there, doesnt make it so, just like Republicans claiming there is a "there" with the Clinton Foundation.
one cant dismiss one, while making excuses for the other, especially if the other is 1000 times worse.
Again, this isn't about a "filing mistake", this is about committing bribery. A specific case of bribery, by trump and bondi. So, yeah, there is indeed a there, there.
The problem is that there is no evidence of bribery.
There was one simple filing mistake, that's it.
You can't say Trump committed bribery without any evidence, then say the Clintons are innocent, and expect anyone to take you seriously.
As I've said, there is 100 times more evidence of wrongdoing by the Clintons, do you believe they committed public corruption?
You are going to have to admit that the Clintons are guilty of dozens of counts of public corruption before anyone is going to believe a word you have to say about Trump.
The problem is that there is no evidence of bribery.
There was one simple filing mistake, that's it.
You can't say Trump committed bribery without any evidence, then say the Clintons are innocent, and expect anyone to take you seriously.
As I've said, there is 100 times more evidence of wrongdoing by the Clintons, do you believe they committed public corruption?
You are going to have to admit that the Clintons are guilty of dozens of counts of public corruption before anyone is going to believe a word you have to say about Trump.
Again, this isn't about the clintons. I haven't said anything either way about the clintons, so you can stop saying I have to 'admit' anything about the clintons. Time will tell regarding trump and bondi, and you may well be correct that he didn't won't be found guilty of wrongdoing... but, I wouldn't hold my breath on that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
