Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Looks like Bernie got something out of that meeting with Hillary.
Still took too long, but better late than never.
Not thrilled that the new head was hand-picked by Clinton, but at this point anyone is better than DWS.
"Debbie Wasserman Schultz has handed the day-to-day operations of the Democratic Party over to Clinton’s hand picked operator Brandon Davis.
Davis assumes the role of Chief of Staff, but in reality, he will be running the Democratic National Committee until a new Chairperson is selected at this year’s convention. He is currently the national political coordinator for the Service Employees International Union (SEIU)."
Looks like Bernie got something out of that meeting with Hillary.
Still took too long, but better late than never.
Not thrilled that the new head was hand-picked by Clinton, but at this point anyone is better than DWS.
"Debbie Wasserman Schultz has handed the day-to-day operations of the Democratic Party over to Clinton’s hand picked operator Brandon Davis.
Davis assumes the role of Chief of Staff, but in reality, he will be running the Democratic National Committee until a new Chairperson is selected at this year’s convention. He is currently the national political coordinator for the Service Employees International Union (SEIU)."
Eh, Idk there. The nominee always takes over the party at this point. It's not like this is something without precedent.
Before anyone tries to correct you,
President Obama didnt take over the party because he created OFA which operated separately from the party and many in the party establishment are still pissed at him until this day about that.
the DNC still doesnt have his donor list or his email list because of it, they only have the shared info.
Indeed, but considering that she and Clinton seemed to be joined at the hip, it suggests that the Clinton camp (finally) saw her as a liability.
I dont think I ever saw the 2 of them in the same room during this entire campaign, and anytime she went on TV, she talked about both Bernie and Hillary even if she was only asked about HIllary.
Seems to me the only people who thought they were joined at the hip were the Bernie supporters.
I dont think I ever saw the 2 of them in the same room during this entire campaign, and anytime she went on TV, she talked about both Bernie and Hillary even if she was only asked about HIllary.
Seems to me the only people who thought they were joined at the hip were the Bernie supporters.
Not just a perception held by Sanders supporters:
"The Nation’s Joan Walsh, a Clinton supporter critical of the Sanders campaign, concurs: “Once again, Democratic National Committee chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz escalated a conflict that she should have worked to defuse,” she writes. “… Wasserman Schultz is not helping her friend Hillary Clinton with her attacks on Sanders. Just the appearance of fairness can go a long way in assuaging worries about fairness. Wasserman Schultz’s defiant rebuke to the Sanders camp has made it worse.”"
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
