Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2016, 12:35 AM
 
Location: Caverns measureless to man...
7,588 posts, read 6,647,095 times
Reputation: 17966

Advertisements

Trouble is, Wasserman Schultz was much more than a spokesperson - as Chair of the DNC, she was in a position of considerable power, and she blatantly used it at every opportunity to shamelessly rig every aspect of the nomination process on Clinton's behalf. Now that the nomination is sewn up, she's no longer even useful, much less necessary, and has become a liability to the party and to Clinton.

But the damage she's done is considerable, and the party will have a difficult time recovering from it. I haven't been a Democrat for many years, but I still have voted for many Democratic candidates. I'm now far less likely to do so than I would have been in the past, and I don't see that changing soon. The memory of that corrupt, amoral hack Wasserman Schultz will last a long time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2016, 02:22 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,727,653 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert_The_Crocodile View Post
Trouble is, Wasserman Schultz was much more than a spokesperson - as Chair of the DNC, she was in a position of considerable power, and she blatantly used it at every opportunity to shamelessly rig every aspect of the nomination process on Clinton's behalf. Now that the nomination is sewn up, she's no longer even useful, much less necessary, and has become a liability to the party and to Clinton.

But the damage she's done is considerable, and the party will have a difficult time recovering from it. I haven't been a Democrat for many years, but I still have voted for many Democratic candidates. I'm now far less likely to do so than I would have been in the past, and I don't see that changing soon. The memory of that corrupt, amoral hack Wasserman Schultz will last a long time.

When the crap hits the fan, examples will be made out of those willing to take individual liberties, for profit & power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2016, 02:31 AM
 
Location: Minnesota
1,548 posts, read 915,662 times
Reputation: 1413
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntwrkguy1 View Post
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss....
Preach it, brother
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2016, 03:00 AM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,798,160 times
Reputation: 16993
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert_The_Crocodile View Post
Trouble is, Wasserman Schultz was much more than a spokesperson - as Chair of the DNC, she was in a position of considerable power, and she blatantly used it at every opportunity to shamelessly rig every aspect of the nomination process on Clinton's behalf. Now that the nomination is sewn up, she's no longer even useful, much less necessary, and has become a liability to the party and to Clinton.

But the damage she's done is considerable, and the party will have a difficult time recovering from it. I haven't been a Democrat for many years, but I still have voted for many Democratic candidates. I'm now far less likely to do so than I would have been in the past, and I don't see that changing soon. The memory of that corrupt, amoral hack Wasserman Schultz will last a long time.
They get rid of her when they no longer need her. But I don't like her so good riddance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2016, 07:58 AM
 
10,926 posts, read 22,033,523 times
Reputation: 10570
Replacement doesn't seem to be much better

New DNC boss also bashed Sanders in leaked emails | Fox News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2016, 12:36 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,139,326 times
Reputation: 8527
It's about damned time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2016, 12:39 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,660,533 times
Reputation: 29386
Don't worry - Clinton has already hired Little Debbie for another position on her team.

See how it works when people don't have to really suffer consequences for what they do?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2016, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,223 posts, read 22,434,350 times
Reputation: 23866
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
Don't worry - Clinton has already hired Little Debbie for another position on her team.

See how it works when people don't have to really suffer consequences for what they do?
Wrong!
Debbie was never hired- she was considered. And now, she is most definitely NOT considered any more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2016, 01:47 PM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,753 posts, read 14,863,870 times
Reputation: 35584
What an odd first name "Wasserman" is....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2016, 02:07 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,313,697 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by banjomike View Post
Wrong!
Debbie was never hired- she was considered. And now, she is most definitely NOT considered any more.
She is working for Hillary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top