Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you wake up from your coma, the national debt is almost 21 TRILLION...
Your precious president has spent MORE THAN EVERY OTHER PRESIDENT TO DATE COMBINED! So don't go saying that the Republicans are bad at spending...
Well they are.
But yeah, for an Obama supporter to yammer about spending is kinda dumb.
Will one of these jackasses ask him to clarify exactly :
"why it is that there is no recommendation to prosecute yet you go on to say 'To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now'".
If they don't directly ask him to explain this then I think the whole hearing is a farce.
I'm watching the hearing right now, and the consistent answer Dir. Comey keeps giving is Hillary wasn't charged because she had no criminal intent. How come that one has never worked for me? "But Officer, I didn't know the speed limit was 50."
I'm watching the hearing right now, and the consistent answer Dir. Comey keeps giving is Hillary wasn't charged because she had no criminal intent. How come that one has never worked for me? "But Officer, I didn't know the speed limit was 50."
Someone brought that up and it's asked and answered.
The Director is not an idiot.
Try as you might this hearing is not going to go your way. There's nothing remotely improper about the investigation nor its outcome.
Hopefully you'll all have the good sense to stop wasting the general public's time and money and accept Dir Comey's recommendation.
Someone brought that up and it's asked and answered.
The Director is not an idiot.
Try as you might this hearing is not going to go your way. There's nothing remotely improper about the investigation nor its outcome.
Hopefully you'll all have the good sense to stop wasting the general public's time and money and accept Dir Comey's recommendation.
As much as I can accept his recommendation from a LEGAL perspective, he was also VERY clear that as he said in his own words, people "are often subject to security or administrative sanctions" which can range anywhere from just being spoken to, all the way to termination of employment.
So somewhere between "just being spoken to" and outright termination of employment, how should Hillary be punished for her failing to live up to the rules and expectations that were part of her previous role as well as the role that she is actively pursuing?
As much as I can accept his recommendation from a LEGAL perspective, he was also VERY clear that as he said in his own words, people "are often subject to security or administrative sanctions" which can range anywhere from just being spoken to, all the way to termination of employment.
So somewhere between "just being spoken to" and outright termination of employment, how should Hillary be punished for her failing to live up to the rules and expectations that were part of her previous role as well as the role that she is actively pursuing?
Since she's no longer employed by the government, there are no administrative sanctions that can happen.
As much as I can accept his recommendation from a LEGAL perspective, he was also VERY clear that as he said in his own words, people "are often subject to security or administrative sanctions" which can range anywhere from just being spoken to, all the way to termination of employment.
So somewhere between "just being spoken to" and outright termination of employment, how should Hillary be punished for her failing to live up to the rules and expectations that were part of her previous role as well as the role that she is actively pursuing?
I think this public raking over the coals is sufficient.
You can't compare apples and kumquats under the law. (In response to sparticus).
If you think the law should be changed then that's the route to take.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
