Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
a clown, a buffoon, a dishonest businessman, a spoiled entitled brat who was born into a millionaire's family, a bully, a thrice-married serial adulterer, an opportunist, a draft dodger.
Eight things listed. The first two are a matter of opinion. The next five are all true. The last one is not true. Trump got a deferment. Not the same thing as being a draft dodger. Either you don't understand the difference, are uninformed, or you don't care about stating the truth.
He's giving a lot of credence to the argument that he did all of this for the publicity. Would he say what is quoted in the tweet if he really wanted to be POTUS? I doubt it.
Trump's inability to control his emotions gave the Gold Star Khan family more than the allotted 15 minutes of fame. Trump took the bait and then some.
If Trump had instead chosen to immediately acknowledge the Khan family's pain and heroism of their son, he could have neutralized the entire situation in a heartbeat.
A POTUS, any POTUS, recieves substantially more criticism each and every day they are in office, no matter what they do, or not. Trump has not demonstrated the ability to control his emotions.
Did anyone ever doubt Trump or any other candidate (Bernie for example) would have to overcome a system that favors the establishment candidates? The establishment/media is down to Hillary so obviously they're going to pull out all the stops. They've tried to bury Trump every step of the way, but luckily 40%+ see through it.
Did anyone ever doubt Trump or any other candidate (Bernie for example) would have to overcome a system that favors the establishment candidates? The establishment/media is down to Hillary so obviously they're going to pull out all the stops. They've tried to bury Trump every step of the way, but luckily 40%+ see through it.
Luckily for the rest of us 40% doesn't win you the White House.
Nobody can put forth a strong argument our elections are tamper-proof. I thought there were college educated folks in here?
The argument is very strong actually. Unlike some other countries our election data is not compiled by the national government. It's reported out publicly from the local level and then aggregated up. A local election official is in charge of counting the votes in each jurisdiction.
This means that to compromise a national election you would have to compromise MANY people, not just a few.
Further, since all past election data is public, you can clearly tell if there are any abnormalities big enough to cause a major shift. For example between one election and the next, very few counties will differ significantly by more than a few percent from the way they voted last time.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
