Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Bernie is feeling let down and between a rock and hard place. He doesn't want Hillary in. She is for big business and Wall St. Bernie knew it all along..So does Trump.
Bernie supporters are bummed out because it is rigged. To put Hillary in is to keep it rigged and Bernie knows it.
Q: What Do You Think Bernie Sanders Is Thinking Right Now?
A: "I'll do everything I can to make sure Clinton is President and not Trump. I mean, it's obvious to anyone who isn't brain-dead that, despite our differences, she's the vastly preferable option. Trump supporters are really clueless if they think I'd ever support their loser candidate."
Bernie is feeling let down and between a rock and hard place. He doesn't want Hillary in. She is for big business and Wall St. Bernie knew it all along..So does Trump.
Bernie supporters are bummed out because it is rigged. To put Hillary in is to keep it rigged and Bernie knows it.
At the same time, Bernie knows Hillary is 10x better than Trump.
You can live in your little land of denial (aka safe space) as it must be nice and cozy (except for those big bad Russians clouding your brain). Most people would take the fact that the people who wrote and received the emails have not claimed one to be false or doctored as a sign they are legit. Actually, HRC on national television defended something stated in one email. Why would she do that if it was fake?
Yep, it's all fake.
I don't want to rehash a month worth of arguments but you guys clearly still dont understand how a political party operates. Networks exist to sell advertisements, to keep the commercials from bumping to each other they have to create programing. Now a news network needs commentators otherwise they would just repeat the same 45 min worth of news over and over, now commentators have to be insiders in order for them to have access to inside(new/entertaining) information is usually people who have worked at that political entity or have personal relationships with people who work there, so in order for them to keep that insider status they have feed their talking points, that's just how that works it has to be a two way street, you get some talking points and some analysis.
As far as I am concerned any information coming from wikileaks should not be believed and should be considered Russian sponsored hacking.
That's right, close your eyes and ears and go to that safe space in your head.
Real news organization should demand that Brazile tell them who gave her the questions for this townhall and others. We need to know whether CNN did it deliberately, knowing she would pass them on, or not. The problem is CNN isn't saying squat. You can say this doesn't matter but what happens the next time when your guy is the candidate they are ganging up on.
I'm just sorry he's off the stage now, because I'd love to hear him respond to Podesta referring to him as a doofus in a Wikileaks memo. Actually, I just want to hear Sanders say the word doofus.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
