Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
“Harris cheerfully recounts the story of sending an attorney from her office to intimidate a homeless single mother whose children were missing school. She smiles as she recalls how she instructed her subordinates to “look really mean” so that the mother would take the threat of jail seriously. In separate footage, Harris mocks those on the left who say things like “build schools, not jails” and “put more money into education, not prisons,” suggesting they are naive sloganeers who do not understand crime prevention.”
Can you imagine if this cretin gets elected to the position of most powerful person in the world?
She will be building gulags for those who don't play along with her vision of society.
Parents who let their kids skip school should be prosecuted .
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest
I dont doubt that you truely believe this
I'm mixed on this. I have always felt that during school days, my kids belonged in school. I despised those parents that took their kids out of school for personal reasons, like a ski trip or other personal time off. I did, and still feel, that they were doing their kids a disfavor.
What argument would one have for NOT prosecuting parents for repeated, and I emphasis, repeated acquisition to absences? Now, there are some legitimate reasons I can think of. As example, a single parent whose under 6 year old child was ill and a babysitter does not accept sick children. Yeah, I know it is not ideal to have children caring for children, but what option would that single parent have? What I am referring to is the repeated acceptance of truancy without some legitimate reason.
On the other hand, what argument would one have FOR prosecuting parents? This is a very nuanced issue, and I can see arguments on both sides being legitimate.
Forget for a moment that its immoral to use child education as an excuse for violence (arresting the parent/s of a child not found to be in a govt school during hours= violence)
Does Kamala Harris believe she is the mother of all children? If you listen to her applauding herself, you can easily see how one might get that impression.
What about home schooling or non-traditional forms of education? Will Harris ban such and force all into govt schools? Looking at her application of the law and her own statements,one can see how she might try to do so.
This woman is a valueless gangster who will usurp parental rights in a heartbeat to achieve her own narcissistic ideal of society.
I'm mixed on this. I have always felt that during school days, my kids belonged in school. I despised those parents that took their kids out of school for personal reasons, like a ski trip or other personal time off. I did, and still feel, that they were doing their kids a disfavor.
What argument would one have for NOT prosecuting parents for repeated, and I emphasis, repeated acquisition to absences? Now, there are some legitimate reasons I can think of. As example, a single parent whose under 6 year old child was ill and a babysitter does not accept sick children. Yeah, I know it is not ideal to have children caring for children, but what option would that single parent have? What I am referring to is the repeated acceptance of truancy without some legitimate reason.
On the other hand, what argument would one have FOR prosecuting parents? This is a very nuanced issue, and I can see arguments on both sides being legitimate.
Go.
I didn't hear her threaten the worthless fathers who are delinquent on child support to single mothers...…..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
