Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-24-2019, 05:58 PM
 
8,505 posts, read 4,567,713 times
Reputation: 9756

Advertisements

Trump is very popular in land regions where there are few sane people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-24-2019, 06:16 PM
 
11,988 posts, read 5,298,736 times
Reputation: 7284
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMS02760 View Post
Trump is very popular in land regions where there are few sane people.
He does very well with the hermit/bison/coyote/scarecrow demos.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2019, 06:28 PM
 
Location: Morrison, CO
34,237 posts, read 18,594,984 times
Reputation: 25807
We are a REPUBLIC not a Democracy. STATES elect Presidents, not PEOPLE. That's the system. Don't like it, amend the Constitution. It has been done many times before.

The Electoral College works as designed as it protects the entire country from being DICTATED to by a few population centers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2019, 06:44 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,872 posts, read 9,550,882 times
Reputation: 15598
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
We are a REPUBLIC not a Democracy. STATES elect Presidents, not PEOPLE. That's the system. Don't like it, amend the Constitution. It has been done many times before.
We ARE talking about STATES. The OP is complaining that WITHIN many states, most of the counties went republican. But they are mostly sparsely populated counties. The counties with the most population tended to go blue.

Your objection is mistaking states for counties. If a certain STATE has 10 counties, and one of them has a million people and the other 9 have only 10,000 each, then the one county with 1 million is going to dominate the STATE's election results. That has nothing to do with the electoral college. It has to do with the population distribution WITHIN a state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2019, 10:25 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 26 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,568 posts, read 16,556,695 times
Reputation: 6044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
We are a REPUBLIC not a Democracy. STATES elect Presidents, not PEOPLE. That's the system. Don't like it, amend the Constitution. It has been done many times before.

The Electoral College works as designed as it protects the entire country from being DICTATED to by a few population centers.
No it doesnt. It exist so slave states were equal to mostly white states.

Virginia for example, only had around 800,000 residents total, 480,000 free residents in 1800, and 322,000 slaves. Compared to New York with 586,000 total residents and only, and only 15,000 being slaves.

They wanted slaves counted, but not voting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2019, 11:51 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,219 posts, read 22,380,933 times
Reputation: 23859
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
We are a REPUBLIC not a Democracy. STATES elect Presidents, not PEOPLE. That's the system. Don't like it, amend the Constitution. It has been done many times before.

The Electoral College works as designed as it protects the entire country from being DICTATED to by a few population centers.
The population centers are not 'few'. There is at least one in every state, and almost always more than one.

In states with low population, the center city where the population is concentrated doesn't have to be all that large. There are 6 states with less than 1 million people: Delaware, Vermont, North Dakota, South Dakota, Alaska and Wyoming.
Wyoming has 579,000 people. If 10% of them live in one city, that's enough to be dominant with 57,900 residents. A town that size is not, by any current measure, a large city.

Cheyenne is the largest city in Wyoming. It has 63,600 residents. That's 11% of the population. Enough for an election to be contested and swung by one small city. But if Laramie, WY, votes with Cheyenne, the 59,000 who live there will make a victory decisive.

On the other hand, Nevada, the 9th least populated but the 7th in size, has a population of 3 million. 75% of them live in Clark county, home of Las Vegas. That means 2,250,000 of that 3 million live in one county.

But Las Vegas is not the only population center in Nevada. Reno is the other. So out of the 750,000 people who don't live in Las Vegas, 245,000 live in Reno. That leaves the other 505,000 scattered all over the state in little bunches.
So if the voters in Las Vegas and Reno vote for the same presidential candidate, all the rest of the state's voters won't make any difference. Even if Reno votes opposite of Las Vegas, it still won't make any difference. Las Vegas dictates every presidential election, period.

You're right saying states elect Presidents, but the president is the only official the people don't vote for directly. People elect all their other representatives from local Mayor to Capitol hill.

The electoral college can be argued both ways, for or against, with something to be said that's equally valid.

But even in the small states with low population, their population centers can still dictate their presidential choices once they grow large enough. And in some small states, 'large' isn't all that large in comparison to more highly populated states.

The west is rapidly growing, but the migrants aren't moving to the little towns. They are moving to the cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2019, 02:36 PM
 
2,923 posts, read 979,011 times
Reputation: 2080
something like 97 of 105 counties in IL went for Trump.

People like to label IL as a blue state - it really isn't. Its better to think of it as a small very blue city-state called Chicago and a large red downstate land mass. They are as divided as you can imagine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2019, 07:55 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 26 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,568 posts, read 16,556,695 times
Reputation: 6044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph_N_1962 View Post
something like 97 of 105 counties in IL went for Trump.

People like to label IL as a blue state - it really isn't. Its better to think of it as a small very blue city-state called Chicago and a large red downstate land mass. They are as divided as you can imagine.
If the majority of a States population lives in or around the city and they vote blue, then it is indeed a "blue state"


Cook County has 5.1 million people. Iroquois County has 29,000 people, but is geographically larger.

The map below is how you should actually view the county in respect to counties and votes.

http://www.viewsoftheworld.net/wp-co...6Cartogram.png


US Presidential Election 2016 - Views of the World
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2019, 08:18 PM
 
Location: 89434
6,658 posts, read 4,749,992 times
Reputation: 4838
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
So?

People vote, not acres or coyotes.

Coyotes are more civilized than the homeless bums in LA or SF that poop on the sidewalk or shoot up drugs in the streets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2019, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,872 posts, read 9,550,882 times
Reputation: 15598
And my cat is more civilized than your garden variety Trump Cultist.

But that doesn't mean she votes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top