No Bump for McCain choosing Palin! O 49 Mc 41 !!!! (vote, poll, represent)

[nick is rulz]

once again Sunshine Chick provides us with that brand of idiocy she has trademarked.

Kerry was consistently neck in neck with Bush throughout most of the election, usually lagging by 1-3 points.

[WingsOfGold]

20% bump? WHERE was that said? Somebody is lying and got caught.

[LordBalfor]

Originally Posted by Sunshine Chick

I do not remember seeing anything about any 20% bump, I do remember all of you saying that Obama would be up by 20 on Friday, so McCains pick just wiped that out real quick.

Even Kerry was up by 15% at this time in 2004, so the dems have lost their grip.

Post for me where you saw what you post? Links??

So as of today, Obama is DOWN BY 12 !!

Actually, according to this (Kerry, Bush in dead heat in post-Democratic convention polls | Japan Policy & Politics | Find Articles at BNET) Kerry and Bush were at a dead heat after the Democratic Convention.

Where are you getting your statistics?

Ken

[Hero]

Voices in her head tell her so

[Mom2Feebs]

Uh, gentlemen, I hate to break the bad news to you, but it is a pretty well-known fact that Kerry was ahead in the polls about this time in 2004. Quite like what we are seeing today with Obama and McCain.

Polling Report

[sanrene]

What happened to all the Republicans claiming McSame was going to get a 20 point bump in the polls after choosing a woman with no experience as VP! LMAO

Who said that?

[LordBalfor]

Originally Posted by Mom2Feebs

Uh, gentlemen, I hate to break the bad news to you, but it is a pretty well-known fact that Kerry was ahead in the polls about this time in 2004. Quite like what we are seeing today with Obama and McCain.

Polling Report

How does what you posted back up what you say (that Kerry was ahead)?
Seems to me it says just the opposite - or more accurately (if any thing) a dead heat.
Did you even read your link before you posted it?

Ken

[Hero]

Originally Posted by LordBalfor

How does what you posted back up what you say (that Kerry was ahead)?
Seems to me it says just the opposite - or more accurately (if any thing) a dead heat.
Did you even read your link before you posted it?

Ken

Google first, post second, read later.

[atxcio]

Originally Posted by Sunshine Chick

I do not remember seeing anything about any 20% bump, I do remember all of you saying that Obama would be up by 20 on Friday, so McCains pick just wiped that out real quick.

Even Kerry was up by 15% at this time in 2004, so the dems have lost their grip.

What the heck are you smoking, Sunshine Chick? Kerry was down by 11% at approximately this time in 2004 (Aug 31). He'd already squandered his lead and kept going down. Here you go:

Campaign 2004: Bush Opens Double-Digit Lead - TIME

You really, really should do some homework before posting some of this stuff.

[atxcio]

Originally Posted by Mom2Feebs

Uh, gentlemen, I hate to break the bad news to you, but it is a pretty well-known fact that Kerry was ahead in the polls about this time in 2004. Quite like what we are seeing today with Obama and McCain.

Polling Report

Wrong too. Sheesh. Read your own link.

8/30 - 9/2/04 %Bush=46 %Kerry=43

Kerry was down by 3 (some polls by much more) at this exact time in 2004.

We accept your apology.